These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1859955)
1. Audit and standards in new general practice. Baker R BMJ; 1991 Jul; 303(6793):32-4. PubMed ID: 1859955 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Aspects of audit. 3: Audit in British general practice. Shaw CD Br Med J; 1980 Jun; 280(6228):1361-3. PubMed ID: 7388545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Audit in general practice: where do we go from here? Spencer J Qual Health Care; 1993 Sep; 2(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 10131464 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Hawthorne effects and research into professional practice. Holden JD J Eval Clin Pract; 2001 Feb; 7(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 11240840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effective audit in general practice: a method for systematically developing audit protocols containing evidence-based review criteria. Fraser RC; Khunti K; Baker R; Lakhani M Br J Gen Pract; 1997 Nov; 47(424):743-6. PubMed ID: 9519525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The doctor, the patient, and their contract. III. Alternative contracts: are they viable? Maynard A; Marinker M; Gray DP Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1986 May; 292(6533):1438-40. PubMed ID: 3087461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Experience in medical audit: general practice. Baker R Postgrad Med J; 1990; 66 Suppl 3():S14-6. PubMed ID: 2247398 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient safety. Silent witness. Gould M Health Serv J; 2008 Sep; ():22-4. PubMed ID: 18833609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Audit at work. The future. Fraser RC Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1981 Apr; 282(6271):1199-200. PubMed ID: 6788135 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Why medical audit? Donald AG Practitioner; 1980 Dec; 224(1350):1278-9. PubMed ID: 7220449 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors influencing audit in general practice. Davies C; Fletcher J; Szczepura A; Wilmot J Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 1996; 9(5):5-9. PubMed ID: 10162123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Working for patients. Carne S J R Soc Health; 1992 Apr; 112(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 1573629 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. ABC of medical computing. Using computers in clinical audit. Kinn S; Lee N; Millman A BMJ; 1995 Sep; 311(7007):739-42. PubMed ID: 7549693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of medical audit advisory groups. Richards C BMJ; 1991 Jan; 302(6769):153-5. PubMed ID: 1995136 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The new general practitioner contract: is there an alternative? Morrell D BMJ; 1989 Apr; 298(6679):1005-7. PubMed ID: 2499367 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. MAAGs (Medical Audit Advisory Groups): the Eli Lilly National Clinical Audit Centre. Baker R; Fraser R Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 1993; 6(3):4-8. PubMed ID: 10131445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In the pursuit of good quality. Huntington J Health Serv J; 1990 Apr; 100(5195):521. PubMed ID: 10104232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. NHS review. Welcome for medical audit. Interview by Dr. Tony Smith. van't Hoff W BMJ; 1989 Apr; 298(6679):1021-3. PubMed ID: 2499374 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Audit in British general practice: domination or disillusionment? Holden JD J Eval Clin Pract; 1999 Aug; 5(3):313-22. PubMed ID: 10461583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Newark Information Sharing Project: lessons for Medical Audit Advisory Groups. Pringle M Health Trends; 1991; 23(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 10113879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]