374 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18599658)
1. I'm hot, so i'd say you're not: the influence of objective physical attractiveness on mate selection.
Montoya RM
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1315-31. PubMed ID: 18599658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What is beautiful is good because what is beautiful is desired: physical attractiveness stereotyping as projection of interpersonal goals.
Lemay EP; Clark MS; Greenberg A
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Mar; 36(3):339-53. PubMed ID: 20179314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Caution: fragile! Regulating the interpersonal security of chronically insecure partners.
Lemay EP; Dudley KL
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Apr; 100(4):681-702. PubMed ID: 21171786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The cultural grounding of personal relationship: the importance of attractiveness in everyday life.
Anderson SL; Adams G; Plaut VC
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Aug; 95(2):352-68. PubMed ID: 18665707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. If I'm not hot, are you hot or not? Physical attractiveness evaluations and dating preferences as a function of one's own attractiveness.
Lee L; Loewenstein G; Ariely D; Hong J; Young J
Psychol Sci; 2008 Jul; 19(7):669-77. PubMed ID: 18727782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Meeting your match: how attractiveness similarity affects approach behavior in mixed-sex dyads.
van Straaten I; Engels RC; Finkenauer C; Holland RW
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Jun; 35(6):685-97. PubMed ID: 19336540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of women's age and physical appearance on evaluations of attractiveness and social desirability.
Perlini AH; Bertolissi S; Lind DL
J Soc Psychol; 1999 Jun; 139(3):343-54. PubMed ID: 10410621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of partner beauty on opposite-sex attractiveness judgments.
Little AC; Caldwell CA; Jones BC; DeBruine LM
Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Dec; 40(6):1119-27. PubMed ID: 21901646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sex differences in judgments of physical attractiveness: a social relations analysis.
Marcus DK; Miller RS
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Mar; 29(3):325-35. PubMed ID: 15273010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Beyond initial attraction: physical attractiveness in newlywed marriage.
McNulty JK; Neff LA; Karney BR
J Fam Psychol; 2008 Feb; 22(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 18266540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mate choice decisions: the role of facial beauty.
Johnston VS
Trends Cogn Sci; 2006 Jan; 10(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 16311066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What is beautiful is good and more accurately understood. Physical attractiveness and accuracy in first impressions of personality.
Lorenzo GL; Biesanz JC; Human LJ
Psychol Sci; 2010 Dec; 21(12):1777-82. PubMed ID: 21051521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Physical attractiveness, physical effectiveness, and self-concept in late adolescents.
Lerner RM; Orlos JB; Knapp JR
Adolescence; 1976; 11(43):313-26. PubMed ID: 998382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An empirical test of sex differences in the emphasis on physical attractiveness in mate selection.
Colwell J
Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Aug; 105(1):326-38. PubMed ID: 17918580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Personality information: does it influence attractiveness ratings of various body sizes?
Fisak B; Tantleff-Dunn S; Peterson RD
Body Image; 2007 Jun; 4(2):213-7. PubMed ID: 18089267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The big, the rich, and the powerful: physical, financial, and social dimensions of dominance in mating and attraction.
Bryan AD; Webster GD; Mahaffey AL
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2011 Mar; 37(3):365-82. PubMed ID: 21252382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Unattractive, promiscuous and heavy drinkers: perceptions of women with tattoos.
Swami V; Furnham A
Body Image; 2007 Dec; 4(4):343-52. PubMed ID: 18089280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of attractiveness and gender on the perception of achievement-related variables.
Chia RC; Allred LJ; Grossnickle WF; Lee GW
J Soc Psychol; 1998 Aug; 138(4):471-7. PubMed ID: 9664863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: testing the tradeoffs.
Li NP; Bailey JM; Kenrick DT; Linsenmeier JA
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Jun; 82(6):947-55. PubMed ID: 12051582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gender stereotyping for sociability, dominance, character, and mental health: a meta-analysis of findings from the bogus stranger paradigm.
Feingold A
Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr; 1998 Aug; 124(3):253-70. PubMed ID: 9679287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
