These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18600436)

  • 1. Cueing confidence in eyewitness identifications: influence of biased lineup instructions and pre-identification memory feedback under varying lineup conditions.
    Leippe MR; Eisenstadt D; Rauch SM
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Jun; 33(3):194-212. PubMed ID: 18600436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of postidentification feedback on eyewitness identification and nonidentification confidence.
    Semmler C; Brewer N; Wells GL
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Apr; 89(2):334-46. PubMed ID: 15065979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A re-examination of the effects of biased lineup instructions in eyewitness identification.
    Clark SE
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Aug; 29(4):395-424. PubMed ID: 16133947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biased lineup instructions and face identification from video images.
    Thompson WB; Johnson J
    J Gen Psychol; 2008 Jan; 135(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 18318406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Postidentification feedback affects subsequent eyewitness identification performance.
    Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Dec; 16(4):387-98. PubMed ID: 21198255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: effects of lineup instructions, foil similarity, and target-absent base rates.
    Brewer N; Wells GL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2006 Mar; 12(1):11-30. PubMed ID: 16536656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lineup administrator influences on eyewitness identification decisions.
    Clark SE; Marshall TE; Rosenthal R
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 19309217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: the effects of reflection and disconfirmation on correlation and calibration.
    Brewer N; Keast A; Rishworth A
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2002 Mar; 8(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 12009176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A re-examination of the effects of biased lineup instructions in eyewitness identification.
    Clark SE
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Oct; 29(5):575-604. PubMed ID: 16254744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The mitigating effects of suspicion on post-identification feedback and on retrospective eyewitness memory.
    Neuschatz JS; Lawson DS; Fairless AH; Powers RA; Neuschatz JS; Goodsell CA; Toglia MP
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Jun; 31(3):231-47. PubMed ID: 17253155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does anyone else look familiar? Influencing identification decisions by asking witnesses to re-examine the lineup.
    Eisen ML; Cedré GC; Williams TQ; Jones JM
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Aug; 42(4):306-320. PubMed ID: 29939064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can eyewitnesses correct for external influences on their lineup identifications? The actual/counterfactual assessment paradigm.
    Charman SD; Wells GL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Mar; 14(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 18377163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Children's identification of faces from lineups: the effects of lineup presentation and instructions on accuracy.
    Beresford J; Blades M
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 Sep; 91(5):1102-13. PubMed ID: 16953771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determining eyewitness identification accuracy using event-related brain potentials (ERPs).
    Lefebvre CD; Marchand Y; Smith SM; Connolly JF
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Nov; 44(6):894-904. PubMed ID: 17666030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Children's susceptibility to misidentifying a familiar bystander from a lineup: When younger is better.
    Ross DF; Marsil DF; Benton TR; Hoffman R; Warren AR; Lindsay RC; Metzger R
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Jun; 30(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 16729204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does methodology matter in eyewitness identification research? The effect of live versus video exposure on eyewitness identification accuracy.
    Pozzulo JD; Crescini C; Panton T
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 18790535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The selective cue integration framework: a theory of postidentification witness confidence assessment.
    Charman SD; Carlucci M; Vallano J; Gregory AH
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Jun; 16(2):204-18. PubMed ID: 20565204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. PC_Eyewitness and the sequential superiority effect: computer-based lineup administration.
    MacLin OH; Zimmerman LA; Malpass RS
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Jun; 29(3):303-21. PubMed ID: 15965630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the presumption of evidentiary independence: can confessions corrupt eyewitness identifications?
    Hasel LE; Kassin SM
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Jan; 20(1):122-6. PubMed ID: 19152544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Children's metacognitive judgments in an eyewitness identification task.
    Keast A; Brewer N; Wells GL
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2007 Aug; 97(4):286-314. PubMed ID: 17512942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.