63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1860078)
1. [Dental-prosthetic margin in bonded esthetic restorations. Clinical aspects].
Magneville B; Dejou J; Simon J
Cah Prothese; 1991 Jun; (74):26-32. PubMed ID: 1860078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials.
Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Adaptation of composites to enamel: relation to the appearance of marginal staining].
Scherman L
Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1990; 19(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 2200097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Direct posterior resin composite restorations: considerations on finishing/polishing. Clinical procedures.
Ferreira Rde S; Lopes GC; Baratieri LN
Quintessence Int; 2004 May; 35(5):359-66. PubMed ID: 15130074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of three surface sealants on marginal sealing of Class V composite resin restorations.
Ramos RP; Chimello DT; Chinelatti MA; Dibb RG; Mondelli J
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):448-53. PubMed ID: 11203855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cavity preparation factors and microleakage of Class II composite restorations filled at intraoral temperatures.
Hilton TJ; Ferracane JL
Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):123-30. PubMed ID: 10649934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bonding of amalgam restorations: existing knowledge and future prospects.
Setcos JC; Staninec M; Wilson NH
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 11203798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of wet and dry bonding techniques on marginal leakage.
Santini A; Mitchell S
Am J Dent; 1998 Oct; 11(5):219-24. PubMed ID: 10388380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of two different polishing techniques on microleakage of new composites in Class V restorations.
Yalçin F; Korkmaz Y; Başeren M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):18-25. PubMed ID: 17091136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of light source position and bevel placement on facial margin adaptation of resin-based composite restorations.
Hoelscher DC; Gregory WA; Linger JB; Pink FE
Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):171-5. PubMed ID: 11763925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Marginal leakage of composite resins as related to time of finishing: a laboratory study.
Harris RK; Clark H; Lund MR; Rhodes B
J Indiana Dent Assoc; 1983; 62(6):9-12. PubMed ID: 6582170
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Conservative indirect restorations for posterior teeth. Cast versus bonded ceramic.
Donovan TE; Chee WW
Dent Clin North Am; 1993 Jul; 37(3):433-43. PubMed ID: 8348996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microleakage of Class II composite restorations.
Wibowo G; Stockton L
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 11572297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Total bonding vs selective bonding: marginal adaptation of Class 2 composite restorations.
Thonemann B; Federlin M; Schmalz G; Grundler W
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(5):261-71. PubMed ID: 10823072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite.
Palaniappan S; Bharadwaj D; Mattar DL; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P
Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1302-14. PubMed ID: 19577288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of finishing method on the microleakage of Class V microfilled composite resin restorations.
Brackett WW; Girdwood BJ
J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1999 Apr; 79(2):24-5. PubMed ID: 10726577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Finishing tooth-colored restorations in vitro: an index of surface alteration and finish-line destruction.
Schmidlin PR; Göhring TN
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 14753337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
