These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1860078)

  • 21. Assessing microleakage in resin composite restorations rebonded with a surface sealant and three low-viscosity resin systems.
    Ramos RP; Chinelatti MA; Chimello DT; Dibb RG
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):450-6. PubMed ID: 12073726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Marginal adaptation of posterior composites. A complex clinical problem].
    Van Meerbeek B; Lasfargues JJ; Willems G; Lambrechts P; Braem M; Van Herle G
    Real Clin; 1990 Jan; 1(1):79-96. PubMed ID: 2223671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An in vitro microleakage study of the 'bonded-base' restorative technique.
    Yap AU; Mok BY; Pearson G
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Mar; 24(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 9131479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Marginal adaptation of Class 5 composite restorations: retention grooves versus enamel and dentin bonding.
    Farid MR; Gomaa HM
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Jul; 41(3):1271-5. PubMed ID: 9497668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Laboratory evaluation of compomers in Class V restorations.
    Chersoni S; Lorenzi R; Ferrieri P; Prati C
    Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9545890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A two-year clinical evaluation of TPH for restoration of Class II carious lesions in permanent teeth.
    Perry RD; Kugel G; Habib CM; McGarry P; Settembrini L
    Gen Dent; 1997; 45(4):344-9. PubMed ID: 9515440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Marginal adaptation and seal of direct and indirect Class II composite resin restorations: an in vitro evaluation.
    Dietschi D; Scampa U; Campanile G; Holz J
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Feb; 26(2):127-38. PubMed ID: 7568723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Direct posterior composite restorations: simplified success through a systematic approach.
    Koczarski MJ; Corredor AC
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2002; 14(1):87-94; quiz 96. PubMed ID: 11905163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of occlusal marginal adaptation of Class II resin-composite restorations.
    Kreulen CM; van Amerongen WE; Akerboom HB; Borgmeijer PJ; Gruythuysen RJ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(4-5):310-4. PubMed ID: 8258575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Microleakage in composite restorations: experimental study].
    Ingenito A; Tammaro G; Boes C; Gisonni A; Goglia F
    Attual Dent; 1990 Sep-30; 6(33):10-3, 16-8, 20-1 passim. PubMed ID: 2288678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of different restorative techniques on microleakage in Class II cavities with gingival wall in cementum.
    Demarco FF; Ramos OL; Mota CS; Formolo E; Justino LM
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):253-9. PubMed ID: 11357567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of marginal bevels on microleakage around Class V cavities bonded with seven self-etching agents.
    Santini A; Ivanovic V; Ibbetson R; Milia E
    Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):257-61. PubMed ID: 15478487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dentin bonding system. Part I: Literature review.
    Miyazaki M; Oshida Y; Xirouchaki L
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1996; 6(1):15-31. PubMed ID: 8727500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A clinical study of the "open sandwich" technique in pediatric dental practice.
    Cannon ML
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 12762613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Marginal adaptation.
    Taylor MJ; Lynch E
    J Dent; 1993 Oct; 21(5):265-73. PubMed ID: 8227687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Esthetic vestibular restorations using composite materials with the direct bonding technique. Interim clinical evaluation].
    Verplancken M; Gheysen M
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 1990; 45(2):71-82. PubMed ID: 2287778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Using chemical vapor deposition diamond finishing burs for conservative esthetic procedures.
    Furuse AY; da Cunha LF; Runnacles P; Pirolo R; Zielak JC
    Gen Dent; 2013 Jul; 61(4):75-7. PubMed ID: 23823351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effects of mechanical loading on marginal integrity of composite restorations.
    Stewart GP; Balda BA; Norman RD
    Dent Mater; 1986 Aug; 2(4):151-2. PubMed ID: 3527830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.