259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18601560)
21. Optical spectroscopy detects histological hallmarks of pancreatic cancer.
Wilson RH; Chandra M; Scheiman J; Simeone D; McKenna B; Purdy J; Mycek MA
Opt Express; 2009 Sep; 17(20):17502-16. PubMed ID: 19907534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Oral cancer detection using diffuse reflectance spectral ratio R540/R575 of oxygenated hemoglobin bands.
Subhash N; Mallia JR; Thomas SS; Mathews A; Sebastian P; Madhavan J
J Biomed Opt; 2006; 11(1):014018. PubMed ID: 16526895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Monte Carlo modeling of multilayer phantoms with multiple fluorophores: simulation algorithm and experimental validation.
Péry E; Blondel WC; Thomas C; Guillemin F
J Biomed Opt; 2009; 14(2):024048. PubMed ID: 19405776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Monte Carlo lookup table-based inverse model for extracting optical properties from tissue-simulating phantoms using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy.
Hennessy R; Lim SL; Markey MK; Tunnell JW
J Biomed Opt; 2013 Mar; 18(3):037003. PubMed ID: 23455965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. In vitro determination of normal and neoplastic human brain tissue optical properties using inverse adding-doubling.
Gebhart SC; Lin WC; Mahadevan-Jansen A
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 51(8):2011-27. PubMed ID: 16585842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A robust Monte Carlo model for the extraction of biological absorption and scattering in vivo.
Bender JE; Vishwanath K; Moore LK; Brown JQ; Chang V; Palmer GM; Ramanujam N
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Apr; 56(4):960-8. PubMed ID: 19423425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Analytical model to describe fluorescence spectra of normal and preneoplastic epithelial tissue: comparison with Monte Carlo simulations and clinical measurements.
Chang SK; Arifler D; Drezek R; Follen M; Richards-Kortum R
J Biomed Opt; 2004; 9(3):511-22. PubMed ID: 15189089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Monte Carlo simulation of NIR diffuse reflectance in the normal and diseased human breast tissues.
Prince S; Malarvizhi S
Biofactors; 2007; 30(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 18607075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Optical characterization of mammalian tissues by laser reflectometry and Monte Carlo simulation.
Kumar D; Srinivasan R; Singh M
Med Eng Phys; 2004 Jun; 26(5):363-9. PubMed ID: 15147744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Monitoring of tissue optical properties during thermal coagulation of ex vivo tissues.
Nagarajan VK; Yu B
Lasers Surg Med; 2016 Sep; 48(7):686-94. PubMed ID: 27250022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Optical breast cancer margin assessment: an observational study of the effects of tissue heterogeneity on optical contrast.
Kennedy S; Geradts J; Bydlon T; Brown JQ; Gallagher J; Junker M; Barry W; Ramanujam N; Wilke L
Breast Cancer Res; 2010; 12(6):R91. PubMed ID: 21054873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. In-vivo characterization of optical properties of pigmented skin lesions including melanoma using oblique incidence diffuse reflectance spectrometry.
Garcia-Uribe A; Smith EB; Zou J; Duvic M; Prieto V; Wang LV
J Biomed Opt; 2011 Feb; 16(2):020501. PubMed ID: 21361657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of fiber optic probe geometry on depth-resolved fluorescence measurements from epithelial tissues: a Monte Carlo simulation.
Zhu C; Liu Q; Ramanujam N
J Biomed Opt; 2003 Apr; 8(2):237-47. PubMed ID: 12683849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Automated classification of breast pathology using local measures of broadband reflectance.
Laughney AM; Krishnaswamy V; Garcia-Allende PB; Conde OM; Wells WA; Paulsen KD; Pogue BW
J Biomed Opt; 2010; 15(6):066019. PubMed ID: 21198193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Enhancing the sensitivity to scattering coefficient of the epithelium in a two-layered tissue model by oblique optical fibers: Monte Carlo study.
Sung KB; Chen HH
J Biomed Opt; 2012 Oct; 17(10):107003. PubMed ID: 23047254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Inverse Monte Carlo method in a multilayered tissue model for diffuse reflectance spectroscopy.
Fredriksson I; Larsson M; Strömberg T
J Biomed Opt; 2012 Apr; 17(4):047004. PubMed ID: 22559695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of autofluorescence, diffuse reflectance, and Raman spectroscopy for breast tissue discrimination.
Majumder SK; Keller MD; Boulos FI; Kelley MC; Mahadevan-Jansen A
J Biomed Opt; 2008; 13(5):054009. PubMed ID: 19021389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Rapid ratiometric determination of hemoglobin concentration using UV-VIS diffuse reflectance at isosbestic wavelengths.
Phelps JE; Vishwanath K; Chang VT; Ramanujam N
Opt Express; 2010 Aug; 18(18):18779-92. PubMed ID: 20940771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Understanding the contributions of NADH and collagen to cervical tissue fluorescence spectra: modeling, measurements, and implications.
Drezek R; Sokolov K; Utzinger U; Boiko I; Malpica A; Follen M; Richards-Kortum R
J Biomed Opt; 2001 Oct; 6(4):385-96. PubMed ID: 11728196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Quantification of in vivo fluorescence decoupled from the effects of tissue optical properties using fiber-optic spectroscopy measurements.
Kim A; Khurana M; Moriyama Y; Wilson BC
J Biomed Opt; 2010; 15(6):067006. PubMed ID: 21198210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
