123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18601800)
1. Comparison of three instruments assessing the quality of economic evaluations: a practical exercise on economic evaluations of the surgical treatment of obesity.
Gerkens S; Crott R; Cleemput I; Thissen JP; Closon MC; Horsmans Y; Beguin C
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(3):318-25. PubMed ID: 18601800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations: Consensus on Health Economic Criteria.
Evers S; Goossens M; de Vet H; van Tulder M; Ament A
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2005; 21(2):240-5. PubMed ID: 15921065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability of two instruments for critical assessment of economic evaluations.
Au F; Prahardhi S; Shiell A
Value Health; 2008; 11(3):435-9. PubMed ID: 18489667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality appraisal of pediatric health economic evaluations.
Ungar WJ; Santos MT
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2005; 21(2):203-10. PubMed ID: 15921060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development and evaluation of an instrument to measure parental satisfaction with quality of care in neonatal follow-up.
Butt ML; Pinelli J; Boyle MH; Thomas H; Hunsberger M; Saigal S; Lee DS; Fanning JK; Austin P
J Dev Behav Pediatr; 2009 Feb; 30(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 19194325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The quality of evidence in health informatics: how did the quality of healthcare IT evaluation publications develop from 1982 to 2005?
de Keizer NF; Ammenwerth E
Int J Med Inform; 2008 Jan; 77(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 17208040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Developing a scoring system to quality assess economic evaluations.
Gonzalez-Perez JG
Eur J Health Econ; 2002; 3(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 15609137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reading and interpreting economic evaluations in rheumatoid arthritis: an assessment of selected instruments for critical appraisal.
Weisman MH; Gano AD; Gabriel SE; Hochberg MC; Kavanaugh A; Ofman JJ; Prashker M; Suarez-Almazor ME; Yelin E; Nakelsky SD; Croft JD;
J Rheumatol; 2003 Aug; 30(8):1739-47. PubMed ID: 12913929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development and evaluation of an oral health literacy instrument for adults.
Sabbahi DA; Lawrence HP; Limeback H; Rootman I
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 37(5):451-62. PubMed ID: 19740249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality assessment of reviewers' reports using a simple instrument.
Landkroon AP; Euser AM; Veeken H; Hart W; Overbeke AJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Oct; 108(4):979-85. PubMed ID: 17012462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Methodologic and Reporting Quality of Economic Evaluations in Hand and Wrist Surgery: A Systematic Review.
Uhlman K; Miroshnychenko A; Duku E; Xie F; Thoma A
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Mar; 149(3):453e-464e. PubMed ID: 35196683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Validity and reliability of a screening instrument for the identification of extensive work-related problems in patients with chronic diseases (SIMBO-C)].
Streibelt M
Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2009 Jun; 48(3):135-44. PubMed ID: 19513954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative evaluation of the measurement properties of various shoulder outcome instruments.
Oh JH; Jo KH; Kim WS; Gong HS; Han SG; Kim YH
Am J Sports Med; 2009 Jun; 37(6):1161-8. PubMed ID: 19403837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of a measurement instrument for nursing documentation in the patient record.
Paans W; Sermeus W; Nieweg R; Van Der Schans C
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 146():297-300. PubMed ID: 19592852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validity and reliability of the Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) in drug induced parkinsonism in the elderly.
Knol W; Keijsers CJ; Jansen PA; Belitser SV; Schobben AF; Egberts AC; van Marum RJ
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry; 2009 Feb; 24(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 18615779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Critical review and quality-assessment of cost analyses in radiotherapy: How reliable are the data?
Defourny N; Monten C; Grau C; Lievens Y; Perrier L
Radiother Oncol; 2019 Dec; 141():14-26. PubMed ID: 31630866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of two instruments for assessing communication skills in a general practice objective structured clinical examination.
Van Nuland M; Van Den Noortgate W; Degryse J; Goedhuys J
Med Educ; 2007 Jul; 41(7):676-83. PubMed ID: 17614888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development and testing of the Gait Assessment and Intervention Tool (G.A.I.T.): a measure of coordinated gait components.
Daly JJ; Nethery J; McCabe JP; Brenner I; Rogers J; Gansen J; Butler K; Burdsall R; Roenigk K; Holcomb J
J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Apr; 178(2):334-9. PubMed ID: 19146879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]