These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18601845)

  • 41. Focus group interviews: a guide for palliative care researchers and clinicians.
    Hudson P
    Int J Palliat Nurs; 2003 May; 9(5):202-7. PubMed ID: 12819597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Qualitative research and the profound grasp of the obvious.
    Hurley RE
    Health Serv Res; 1999 Dec; 34(5 Pt 2):1119-36. PubMed ID: 10591276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Reviewing studies with diverse designs: the development and evaluation of a new tool.
    Sirriyeh R; Lawton R; Gardner P; Armitage G
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2012 Aug; 18(4):746-52. PubMed ID: 21410846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The use of "mixing" procedure of mixed methods in health services research.
    Zhang W; Creswell J
    Med Care; 2013 Aug; 51(8):e51-7. PubMed ID: 23860333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Use of focus group interviews in health science].
    Kjærgaard Danielsen A; Spanager L
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2012 May; 174(19):1298-302. PubMed ID: 22564686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Qualitative Research in Health Services Research - Discussion Paper, Part 3: Quality of Qualitative Research].
    Stamer M; Güthlin C; Holmberg C; Karbach U; Patzelt C; Meyer T;
    Gesundheitswesen; 2015 Dec; 77(12):966-75. PubMed ID: 26714312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Experience-based, body-anchored qualitative research interviewing.
    Stelter R
    Qual Health Res; 2010 Jun; 20(6):859-67. PubMed ID: 20220152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Critically appraising qualitative research: a guide for clinicians more familiar with quantitative techniques.
    Kisely S; Kendall E
    Australas Psychiatry; 2011 Aug; 19(4):364-7. PubMed ID: 21864012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Aggregation of qualitative studies--From theory to practice: Patient priorities and family medicine/general practice evaluations.
    Reis S; Hermoni D; Van-Raalte R; Dahan R; Borkan JM
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Feb; 65(2):214-22. PubMed ID: 17010557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Emphasizing quality in qualitative papers.
    McKenna J; Mutrie N
    J Sports Sci; 2003 Dec; 21(12):955-8. PubMed ID: 14748453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Molding qualitative health research.
    Morse JM
    Qual Health Res; 2011 Aug; 21(8):1019-21. PubMed ID: 21768617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Quantitative and qualitative research methods, can they coexist yet?].
    Hunt E; Lavoie AM
    Rech Soins Infirm; 2011 Jun; (105):25-30. PubMed ID: 21800639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The problem of appraising qualitative research.
    Dixon-Woods M; Shaw RL; Agarwal S; Smith JA
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2004 Jun; 13(3):223-5. PubMed ID: 15175495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Toward a culture of qualitative thinking in health services research.
    Hoff TJ
    Med Care Res Rev; 2011 Feb; 68(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 20889575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Designing quality health services research: why comparative effectiveness studies are needed and why pharmacists should be involved.
    Carter BL
    Pharmacotherapy; 2010 Aug; 30(8):751-7. PubMed ID: 20653349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A comparative analysis of three online appraisal instruments' ability to assess validity in qualitative research.
    Hannes K; Lockwood C; Pearson A
    Qual Health Res; 2010 Dec; 20(12):1736-43. PubMed ID: 20671302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Evaluative criteria for qualitative research in health care: controversies and recommendations.
    Cohen DJ; Crabtree BF
    Ann Fam Med; 2008; 6(4):331-9. PubMed ID: 18626033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Evidence-based care: enhancing the rigour of a qualitative study.
    McBrien B
    Br J Nurs; 2008 Nov 13-26; 17(20):1286-9. PubMed ID: 19043334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Critically appraising qualitative research.
    Kuper A; Lingard L; Levinson W
    BMJ; 2008 Aug; 337():a1035. PubMed ID: 18687726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The role of topic, interviewee and question in predicting rich interview data in the field of health research.
    Ogden J; Cornwell D
    Sociol Health Illn; 2010 Nov; 32(7):1059-71. PubMed ID: 20942822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.