343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18602485)
1. Quantification of the benefit from integrating MEG and EEG data in minimum l2-norm estimation.
Molins A; Stufflebeam SM; Brown EN; Hämäläinen MS
Neuroimage; 2008 Sep; 42(3):1069-77. PubMed ID: 18602485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Towards an objective evaluation of EEG/MEG source estimation methods - The linear approach.
Hauk O; Stenroos M; Treder MS
Neuroimage; 2022 Jul; 255():119177. PubMed ID: 35390459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the spatial resolution of source imaging techniques in high-density EEG and MEG.
Hedrich T; Pellegrino G; Kobayashi E; Lina JM; Grova C
Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 157():531-544. PubMed ID: 28619655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. EEG minimum-norm estimation compared with MEG dipole fitting in the localization of somatosensory sources at S1.
Komssi S; Huttunen J; Aronen HJ; Ilmoniemi RJ
Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Mar; 115(3):534-42. PubMed ID: 15036048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.
Liu AK; Dale AM; Belliveau JW
Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 May; 16(1):47-62. PubMed ID: 11870926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals.
Engemann DA; Gramfort A
Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():328-42. PubMed ID: 25541187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Linear inverse source estimate of combined EEG and MEG data related to voluntary movements.
Babiloni F; Carducci F; Cincotti F; Del Gratta C; Pizzella V; Romani GL; Rossini PM; Tecchio F; Babiloni C
Hum Brain Mapp; 2001 Dec; 14(4):197-209. PubMed ID: 11668651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sparse current source estimation for MEG using loose orientation constraints.
Chang WT; Ahlfors SP; Lin FH
Hum Brain Mapp; 2013 Sep; 34(9):2190-201. PubMed ID: 22438263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimum-norm cortical source estimation in layered head models is robust against skull conductivity error.
Stenroos M; Hauk O
Neuroimage; 2013 Nov; 81():265-272. PubMed ID: 23639259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. EEG/MEG source imaging using fMRI informed time-variant constraints.
Xu J; Sheng J; Qian T; Luo YJ; Gao JH
Hum Brain Mapp; 2018 Apr; 39(4):1700-1711. PubMed ID: 29293277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multimodal integration of EEG and MEG data: a simulation study with variable signal-to-noise ratio and number of sensors.
Babiloni F; Babiloni C; Carducci F; Romani GL; Rossini PM; Angelone LM; Cincotti F
Hum Brain Mapp; 2004 May; 22(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 15083526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A framework for the design of flexible cross-talk functions for spatial filtering of EEG/MEG data: DeFleCT.
Hauk O; Stenroos M
Hum Brain Mapp; 2014 Apr; 35(4):1642-53. PubMed ID: 23616402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sensitivity of MEG and EEG to source orientation.
Ahlfors SP; Han J; Belliveau JW; Hämäläinen MS
Brain Topogr; 2010 Sep; 23(3):227-32. PubMed ID: 20640882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MEG source imaging method using fast L1 minimum-norm and its applications to signals with brain noise and human resting-state source amplitude images.
Huang MX; Huang CW; Robb A; Angeles A; Nichols SL; Baker DG; Song T; Harrington DL; Theilmann RJ; Srinivasan R; Heister D; Diwakar M; Canive JM; Edgar JC; Chen YH; Ji Z; Shen M; El-Gabalawy F; Levy M; McLay R; Webb-Murphy J; Liu TT; Drake A; Lee RR
Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 84():585-604. PubMed ID: 24055704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of MEG source reconstruction method on source-space connectivity estimation: A comparison between minimum-norm solution and beamforming.
Hincapié AS; Kujala J; Mattout J; Pascarella A; Daligault S; Delpuech C; Mery D; Cosmelli D; Jerbi K
Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():29-42. PubMed ID: 28479475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing and improving the spatial accuracy in MEG source localization by depth-weighted minimum-norm estimates.
Lin FH; Witzel T; Ahlfors SP; Stufflebeam SM; Belliveau JW; Hämäläinen MS
Neuroimage; 2006 May; 31(1):160-71. PubMed ID: 16520063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Divergent cortical generators of MEG and EEG during human sleep spindles suggested by distributed source modeling.
Dehghani N; Cash SS; Chen CC; Hagler DJ; Huang M; Dale AM; Halgren E
PLoS One; 2010 Jul; 5(7):e11454. PubMed ID: 20628643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Complex patterns of spatially extended generators of epileptic activity: Comparison of source localization methods cMEM and 4-ExSo-MUSIC on high resolution EEG and MEG data.
Chowdhury RA; Merlet I; Birot G; Kobayashi E; Nica A; Biraben A; Wendling F; Lina JM; Albera L; Grova C
Neuroimage; 2016 Dec; 143():175-195. PubMed ID: 27561712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
