565 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18602670)
1. Tumor cell type can be reproducibly diagnosed and is of independent prognostic significance in patients with maximally debulked ovarian carcinoma.
Gilks CB; Ionescu DN; Kalloger SE; Köbel M; Irving J; Clarke B; Santos J; Le N; Moravan V; Swenerton K;
Hum Pathol; 2008 Aug; 39(8):1239-51. PubMed ID: 18602670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mixed ovarian epithelial carcinomas with clear cell and serous components are variants of high-grade serous carcinoma: an interobserver correlative and immunohistochemical study of 32 cases.
Han G; Gilks CB; Leung S; Ewanowich CA; Irving JA; Longacre TA; Soslow RA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 Jul; 32(7):955-64. PubMed ID: 18460981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Expression level of Wilms tumor 1 (WT1) protein has limited prognostic value in epithelial ovarian cancer: from the Danish "MALOVA" ovarian cancer study.
Høgdall EV; Christensen L; Kjaer SK; Blaakaer J; Christensen IJ; Gayther S; Jacobs IJ; Høgdall CK
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Aug; 106(2):318-24. PubMed ID: 17540436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tumor type and substage predict survival in stage I and II ovarian carcinoma: insights and implications.
Köbel M; Kalloger SE; Santos JL; Huntsman DG; Gilks CB; Swenerton KD
Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Jan; 116(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 19822358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Testing of two binary grading systems for FIGO stage III serous carcinoma of the ovary and peritoneum.
Seidman JD; Horkayne-Szakaly I; Cosin JA; Ryu HS; Haiba M; Boice CR; Yemelyanova AV
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Nov; 103(2):703-8. PubMed ID: 16828848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Clinicopathologic analysis and expression of cyclin D1 and p53 of ovarian borderline tumors and carcinomas].
Shao HL; Shen DH; Xue WC; Li Y; Yu YZ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Apr; 42(4):227-32. PubMed ID: 17631760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Toward the development of a universal grading system for ovarian epithelial carcinoma. I. Prognostic significance of histopathologic features--problems involved in the architectural grading system.
Shimizu Y; Kamoi S; Amada S; Hasumi K; Akiyama F; Silverberg SG
Gynecol Oncol; 1998 Jul; 70(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 9698465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Assessment of prognostic factors in common ovarian tumors of varying malignancy].
Demeter A; Várkonyi T; Csapó Z; Szánthó A; Oláh J; Papp Z
Magy Onkol; 2004; 48(3):259-65. PubMed ID: 15520877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interobserver and intraobserver variability of a two-tier system for grading ovarian serous carcinoma.
Malpica A; Deavers MT; Tornos C; Kurman RJ; Soslow R; Seidman JD; Munsell MF; Gaertner E; Frishberg D; Silva EG
Am J Surg Pathol; 2007 Aug; 31(8):1168-74. PubMed ID: 17667538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of the histologic grading for ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma: a retrospective multi-institutional study by the Japan Clear Cell Carcinoma Study Group.
Yamamoto S; Kasajima A; Takano M; Yaegashi N; Fujiwara H; Kuzuya K; Kigawa J; Tsuda H; Kurachi H; Kikuchi Y; Sugiyama T; Tsuda H; Moriya T
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2011 Mar; 30(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 21293288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pathological classification and grading of primary ovarian carcinoma: experience of the ARTAC ovarian study group.
Vacher-Lavenu MC; Le Tourneau A; Duvillard P; Godefroy N; Pinel MC
Bull Cancer; 1993 Feb; 80(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 8173164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ovarian nonsmall cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 11 cases.
Veras E; Deavers MT; Silva EG; Malpica A
Am J Surg Pathol; 2007 May; 31(5):774-82. PubMed ID: 17460463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic significance and interobserver variability of histologic grading systems for endometrial carcinoma.
Scholten AN; Smit VT; Beerman H; van Putten WL; Creutzberg CL
Cancer; 2004 Feb; 100(4):764-72. PubMed ID: 14770433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Morphological subtypes of ovarian carcinoma: a review with emphasis on new developments and pathogenesis.
McCluggage WG
Pathology; 2011 Aug; 43(5):420-32. PubMed ID: 21716157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The recurrence and the overall survival rates of ovarian serous borderline neoplasms with noninvasive implants is time dependent.
Silva EG; Gershenson DM; Malpica A; Deavers M
Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Nov; 30(11):1367-71. PubMed ID: 17063075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Do clear cell ovarian carcinomas have poorer prognosis compared to other epithelial cell types? A study of 1411 clear cell ovarian cancers.
Chan JK; Teoh D; Hu JM; Shin JY; Osann K; Kapp DS
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Jun; 109(3):370-6. PubMed ID: 18395777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reproducibility and prognostic variability of grade and lamina propria invasion in stages Ta, T1 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.
Bol MG; Baak JP; Buhr-Wildhagen S; Kruse AJ; Kjellevold KH; Janssen EA; Mestad O; Øgreid P
J Urol; 2003 Apr; 169(4):1291-4. PubMed ID: 12629345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinoma (EAOC): an entity distinct from other ovarian carcinomas as suggested by a nested case-control study.
Erzen M; Rakar S; Klancnik B; Syrjänen K
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Oct; 83(1):100-8. PubMed ID: 11585420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantification of p53 in epithelial ovarian cancer.
Geisler JP; Geisler HE; Wiemann MC; Givens SS; Zhou Z; Miller GA
Gynecol Oncol; 1997 Sep; 66(3):435-8. PubMed ID: 9299258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differences in tumor type in low-stage versus high-stage ovarian carcinomas.
Köbel M; Kalloger SE; Huntsman DG; Santos JL; Swenerton KD; Seidman JD; Gilks CB;
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2010 May; 29(3):203-11. PubMed ID: 20407318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
