These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18603667)

  • 1. Frequency-difference electrical impedance tomography (fdEIT): algorithm development and feasibility study.
    Seo JK; Lee J; Kim SW; Zribi H; Woo EJ
    Physiol Meas; 2008 Aug; 29(8):929-44. PubMed ID: 18603667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frequency-difference EIT (fdEIT) using weighted difference and equivalent homogeneous admittivity: validation by simulation and tank experiment.
    Jun SC; Kuen J; Lee J; Woo EJ; Holder D; Seo JK
    Physiol Meas; 2009 Oct; 30(10):1087-99. PubMed ID: 19738319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of a multi-frequency electrical impedance tomography (mfEIT) system KHU Mark1: impedance spectroscopy and time-difference imaging.
    Oh TI; Koo H; Lee KH; Kim SM; Lee J; Kim SW; Seo JK; Woo EJ
    Physiol Meas; 2008 Mar; 29(3):295-307. PubMed ID: 18367806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) for high-resolution conductivity imaging.
    Woo EJ; Seo JK
    Physiol Meas; 2008 Oct; 29(10):R1-26. PubMed ID: 18799834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factorization method and its physical justification in frequency-difference electrical impedance tomography.
    Harrach B; Seo JK; Woo EJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Nov; 29(11):1918-26. PubMed ID: 20570764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reconstruction of the shape of conductivity spectra using differential multi-frequency magnetic induction tomography.
    Brunner P; Merwa R; Missner A; Rosell J; Hollaus K; Scharfetter H
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S237-48. PubMed ID: 16636414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrical impedance tomography of human brain function using reconstruction algorithms based on the finite element method.
    Bagshaw AP; Liston AD; Bayford RH; Tizzard A; Gibson AP; Tidswell AT; Sparkes MK; Dehghani H; Binnie CD; Holder DS
    Neuroimage; 2003 Oct; 20(2):752-64. PubMed ID: 14568449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Solution of the inverse problem of magnetic induction tomography (MIT).
    Merwa R; Hollaus K; Brunner P; Scharfetter H
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S241-50. PubMed ID: 15798237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accounting for hardware imperfections in EIT image reconstruction algorithms.
    Hartinger AE; Gagnon H; Guardo R
    Physiol Meas; 2007 Jul; 28(7):S13-27. PubMed ID: 17664631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of anomaly location and size using electrical impedance tomography.
    Kwon O; Yoon JR; Seo JK; Woo EJ; Cho YG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jan; 50(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 12617528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Imaging of conductivity changes and electrode movement in EIT.
    Soleimani M; Gómez-Laberge C; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S103-13. PubMed ID: 16636402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multi-frequency time-difference complex conductivity imaging of canine and human lungs using the KHU Mark1 EIT system.
    Kuen J; Woo EJ; Seo JK
    Physiol Meas; 2009 Jun; 30(6):S149-64. PubMed ID: 19491441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reconstruction of conductivity changes and electrode movements based on EIT temporal sequences.
    Dai T; Gómez-Laberge C; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2008 Jun; 29(6):S77-88. PubMed ID: 18544802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Direct reconstruction of tissue parameters from differential multifrequency EIT in vivo.
    Mayer M; Brunner P; Merwa R; Smolle-Jüttner FM; Maier A; Scharfetter H
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S93-101. PubMed ID: 16636423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The boundary element method in the forward and inverse problem of electrical impedance tomography.
    de Munck JC; Faes TJ; Heethaar RM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Jun; 47(6):792-800. PubMed ID: 10833854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A real-time electrical impedance tomograph.
    Edic PM; Saulnier GJ; Newell JC; Isaacson D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1995 Sep; 42(9):849-59. PubMed ID: 7558059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reconstruction of conductivity using the dual-loop method with one injection current in MREIT.
    Lee TH; Nam HS; Lee MG; Kim YJ; Woo EJ; Kwon OI
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Dec; 55(24):7523-39. PubMed ID: 21098919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An iterative Newton-Raphson method to solve the inverse admittivity problem.
    Edic PM; Isaacson D; Saulnier GJ; Jain H; Newell JC
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Jul; 45(7):899-908. PubMed ID: 9644899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Direct EIT Jacobian calculations for conductivity change and electrode movement.
    Gómez-Laberge C; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2008 Jun; 29(6):S89-99. PubMed ID: 18544810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Design of a microscopic electrical impedance tomography system using two current injections.
    Liu Q; Oh TI; Wi H; Lee EJ; Seo JK; Woo EJ
    Physiol Meas; 2011 Sep; 32(9):1505-16. PubMed ID: 21828912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.