174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18604604)
1. Lack of repeatable differential expression patterns between MON810 and comparable commercial varieties of maize.
Coll A; Nadal A; Palaudelmàs M; Messeguer J; Melé E; Puigdomènech P; Pla M
Plant Mol Biol; 2008 Sep; 68(1-2):105-17. PubMed ID: 18604604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gene expression profiles of MON810 and comparable non-GM maize varieties cultured in the field are more similar than are those of conventional lines.
Coll A; Nadal A; Collado R; Capellades G; Messeguer J; Melé E; Palaudelmàs M; Pla M
Transgenic Res; 2009 Oct; 18(5):801-8. PubMed ID: 19396622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Natural variation explains most transcriptomic changes among maize plants of MON810 and comparable non-GM varieties subjected to two N-fertilization farming practices.
Coll A; Nadal A; Collado R; Capellades G; Kubista M; Messeguer J; Pla M
Plant Mol Biol; 2010 Jun; 73(3):349-62. PubMed ID: 20349115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The use of massive sequencing to detect differences between immature embryos of MON810 and a comparable non-GM maize variety.
La Paz JL; Pla M; Centeno E; Vicient CM; Puigdomènech P
PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e100895. PubMed ID: 24967839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Proteomic analysis of MON810 and comparable non-GM maize varieties grown in agricultural fields.
Coll A; Nadal A; Rossignol M; Puigdomènech P; Pla M
Transgenic Res; 2011 Aug; 20(4):939-49. PubMed ID: 20972621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterization of polyadenylated cryIA(b) transcripts in maize MON810 commercial varieties.
La Paz JL; Vicient C; Puigdomènech P; Pla M
Anal Bioanal Chem; 2010 Mar; 396(6):2125-33. PubMed ID: 19841912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Proteomic analysis of four Brazilian MON810 maize varieties and their four non-genetically-modified isogenic varieties.
Balsamo GM; Cangahuala-Inocente GC; Bertoldo JB; Terenzi H; Arisi AC
J Agric Food Chem; 2011 Nov; 59(21):11553-9. PubMed ID: 21958074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of drought stress response and gene expression between a GM maize variety and a near-isogenic non-GM variety.
Gullì M; Salvatori E; Fusaro L; Pellacani C; Manes F; Marmiroli N
PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0117073. PubMed ID: 25692547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transgene behavior in Zea mays L. crosses across different genetic backgrounds: Segregation patterns, cry1Ab transgene expression, insecticidal protein concentration and bioactivity against insect pests.
Lohn AF; Trtikova M; Chapela I; Van den Berg J; du Plessis H; Hilbeck A
PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238523. PubMed ID: 32911522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction methods for four genetically modified maize varieties and maize DNA content in food.
Brodmann PD; Ilg EC; Berthoud H; Herrmann A
J AOAC Int; 2002; 85(3):646-53. PubMed ID: 12083257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analytical method evaluation and discovery of variation within maize varieties in the context of food safety: transcript profiling and metabolomics.
Zeng W; Hazebroek J; Beatty M; Hayes K; Ponte C; Maxwell C; Zhong CX
J Agric Food Chem; 2014 Apr; 62(13):2997-3009. PubMed ID: 24564827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A proteomic-based approach to study underlying molecular responses of the small intestine of Wistar rats to genetically modified corn (MON810).
Al-Harbi A; Lary S; Edwards MG; Qusti S; Cockburn A; Poulsen M; Gatehouse AMR
Transgenic Res; 2019 Dec; 28(5-6):479-498. PubMed ID: 31172414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of two GM maize varieties with a near-isogenic non-GM variety using transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics.
Barros E; Lezar S; Anttonen MJ; van Dijk JP; Röhlig RM; Kok EJ; Engel KH
Plant Biotechnol J; 2010 May; 8(4):436-51. PubMed ID: 20132517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Absolute quantification of genetically modified MON810 maize (Zea mays L.) by digital polymerase chain reaction.
Corbisier P; Bhat S; Partis L; Xie VR; Emslie KR
Anal Bioanal Chem; 2010 Mar; 396(6):2143-50. PubMed ID: 19816678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Individual detection of genetically modified maize varieties in non-identity-preserved maize samples.
Akiyama H; Sakata K; Kondo K; Tanaka A; Liu MS; Oguchi T; Furui S; Kitta K; Hino A; Teshima R
J Agric Food Chem; 2008 Mar; 56(6):1977-83. PubMed ID: 18298063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of real-time PCR based methods for quantification of pollen-mediated gene flow from GM to conventional maize in a field study.
Pla M; La Paz JL; Peñas G; García N; Palaudelmàs M; Esteve T; Messeguer J; Melé E
Transgenic Res; 2006 Apr; 15(2):219-28. PubMed ID: 16604462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect on transcriptome and metabolome of stacked transgenic maize containing insecticidal cry and glyphosate tolerance epsps genes.
Wang XJ; Zhang X; Yang JT; Wang ZX
Plant J; 2018 Mar; 93(6):1007-1016. PubMed ID: 29356248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of omics analytical methods in the study of genetically modified maize varieties tested in 90 days feeding trials.
Corujo M; Pla M; van Dijk J; Voorhuijzen M; Staats M; Slot M; Lommen A; Barros E; Nadal A; Puigdomènech P; Paz JL; van der Voet H; Kok E
Food Chem; 2019 Sep; 292():359-371. PubMed ID: 31054688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimised padlock probe ligation and microarray detection of multiple (non-authorised) GMOs in a single reaction.
Prins TW; van Dijk JP; Beenen HG; Van Hoef AA; Voorhuijzen MM; Schoen CD; Aarts HJ; Kok EJ
BMC Genomics; 2008 Dec; 9():584. PubMed ID: 19055784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
