These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18604956)

  • 1. On the immunity of perceptual implicit memory to manipulations of attention.
    Newell BR; Cavenett T; Andrews S
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Jun; 36(4):725-34. PubMed ID: 18604956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attention and perceptual priming in the perceptual identification task.
    Mulligan NW; Hornstein SL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 May; 26(3):626-37. PubMed ID: 10855421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attention and perceptual implicit memory: effects of selective versus divided attention and number of visual objects.
    Mulligan NW
    Psychol Res; 2002 Aug; 66(3):157-65. PubMed ID: 12192444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of attention on perceptual implicit memory.
    Rajaram S; Srinivas K; Travers S
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Oct; 29(7):920-30. PubMed ID: 11820751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual implicit memory requires attentional encoding.
    Crabb BT; Dark VJ
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Mar; 27(2):267-75. PubMed ID: 10226437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The word frequency effect in recognition memory versus repetition priming.
    Kinoshita S
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Sep; 23(5):569-80. PubMed ID: 7476243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Even frequent and expected words are not identified without spatial attention.
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Kouchi S; Lachter J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):973-88. PubMed ID: 20436194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attention and implicit memory in the category-verification and lexical decision tasks.
    Mulligan NW; Peterson D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):662-79. PubMed ID: 18444763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Word priming without awareness: A new approach to circumvent explicit memory contamination.
    Beauregard M; Benhamou J; Laurent C; Chertkow H
    Brain Cogn; 1999 Apr; 39(3):149-69. PubMed ID: 10101038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relationship between contextual facilitation and depth of processing.
    Smith MC; Theodor L; Franklin PE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1983 Oct; 9(4):697-712. PubMed ID: 6227683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repetition priming across distinct contexts: effects of lexical status, word frequency, and retrieval test.
    Coane JH; Balota DA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Dec; 63(12):2376-98. PubMed ID: 20574932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relations between emotion, memory, and attention: evidence from taboo stroop, lexical decision, and immediate memory tasks.
    MacKay DG; Shafto M; Taylor JK; Marian DE; Abrams L; Dyer JR
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Apr; 32(3):474-88. PubMed ID: 15285130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Manipulation of attention at study affects an explicit but not an implicit test of memory.
    Szymanski KF; MacLeod CM
    Conscious Cogn; 1996; 5(1-2):165-75. PubMed ID: 8733929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implicit memory for possible and impossible objects: constraints on the construction of structural descriptions.
    Schacter DL; Cooper LA; Delaney SM; Peterson MA; Tharan M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1991 Jan; 17(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 1826731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impaired color word processing at an unattended location: evidence from a Stroop task combined with inhibition of return.
    Choi JM; Cho YS; Proctor RW
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Sep; 37(6):935-44. PubMed ID: 19679871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Semantic processing and memory for attended and unattended words in dichotic listening: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Bentin S; Kutas M; Hillyard SA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1995 Feb; 21(1):54-67. PubMed ID: 7707033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of divided attention on auditory priming.
    Mulligan NW; Duke M; Cooper AW
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Sep; 35(6):1245-54. PubMed ID: 18035624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Separate and combined effects of location cuing and repetition priming on perceptual encoding of words.
    Alexander R; Reinitz MT
    Psychol Sci; 2000 Sep; 11(5):419-23. PubMed ID: 11228915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Repetition in visual word identification: benefits and costs.
    Burt JS; Kipps TJ; Matthews JR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Oct; 67(10):1986-2009. PubMed ID: 25248100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Manipulation of Attention at Study Affects an Explicit but Not an Implicit Test of Memory.
    Szymanski KF; MacLeod CM
    Conscious Cogn; 1996 Mar; 5(1/2):165-75. PubMed ID: 8978529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.