These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18604963)

  • 1. Framing effects on metacognitive monitoring and control.
    Finn B
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Jun; 36(4):813-21. PubMed ID: 18604963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Framing affects scale usage for judgments of learning, not confidence in memory.
    England BD; Ortegren FR; Serra MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1898-1908. PubMed ID: 28504530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are we aware of our ability to forget? Metacognitive predictions of directed forgetting.
    Friedman MC; Castel AD
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Nov; 39(8):1448-56. PubMed ID: 21638106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Metamemory and Memory Discrepancies in Directed Forgetting of Emotional Information.
    Çapan D; Ikier S
    Eur J Psychol; 2021 Feb; 17(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 33737973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Slow judgments of learning predict familiarity-based memories as measured by the remember-know task.
    Jang Y
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Nov; 48(11):1618-1637. PubMed ID: 34516209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why do learners ignore expected feedback in making metacognitive decisions about retrieval practice?
    Toppino TC; Heslin KA; Curley TM; Jackiewicz MK; Flowers CS; Phelan HA
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Oct; 49(7):1423-1435. PubMed ID: 33770397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnitude and accuracy differences between judgements of remembering and forgetting.
    Serra MJ; England BD
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(11):2231-57. PubMed ID: 22630784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring memory monitoring with judgements of retention (JORs).
    Tauber SK; Rhodes MG
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(7):1376-96. PubMed ID: 22524495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Judgments of learning enhance recall for category-cued but not letter-cued items.
    Rivers ML; Dunlosky J; Janes JL; Witherby AE; Tauber SK
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Oct; 51(7):1547-1561. PubMed ID: 37173589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How influenceable is our metamemory for pictorial material? The impact of framing and emotionality on metamemory judgments.
    Schmoeger M; Deckert M; Loos E; Willinger U
    Cognition; 2020 Feb; 195():104112. PubMed ID: 31759319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Judgments of learning (JOLs) selectively improve memory depending on the type of test.
    Myers SJ; Rhodes MG; Hausman HE
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Jul; 48(5):745-758. PubMed ID: 32124334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hindsight bias in metamemory: outcome knowledge influences the recollection of judgments of learning.
    Zimdahl MF; Undorf M
    Memory; 2021 May; 29(5):559-572. PubMed ID: 33896394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Confidence ratings are better predictors of future performance than delayed judgments of learning.
    Putnam AL; Deng W; DeSoto KA
    Memory; 2022 May; 30(5):537-553. PubMed ID: 35037570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Metamemory that matters: judgments of importance can engage responsible remembering.
    Murphy DH; Castel AD
    Memory; 2021 Mar; 29(3):271-283. PubMed ID: 33726614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The metamemory expectancy illusion in source monitoring affects metamemory control and memory.
    Schaper ML; Bayen UJ
    Cognition; 2021 Jan; 206():104468. PubMed ID: 33160240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Metacognitive monitoring during criterion learning: when and why are judgments accurate?
    Pyc MA; Rawson KA; Aschenbrenner AJ
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Aug; 42(6):886-97. PubMed ID: 24643790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of identical word pairs on people's metamemory judgments: What are the contributions of processing fluency and beliefs about memory?
    Mueller ML; Dunlosky J; Tauber SK
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(4):781-99. PubMed ID: 26059683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metacognitive unawareness of the errorful generation benefit and its effects on self-regulated learning.
    Yang C; Potts R; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1073-1092. PubMed ID: 28114778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recollection-based prospective metamemory judgments are more accurate than those based on confidence: judgments of remembering and knowing (JORKS).
    McCabe DP; Soderstrom NC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):605-21. PubMed ID: 21707208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reactivity from judgments of learning is not only due to memory forecasting: evidence from associative memory and frequency judgments.
    Maxwell NP; Huff MJ
    Metacogn Learn; 2022; 17(2):589-625. PubMed ID: 35505852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.