These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18605497)

  • 21. Reexamining the word length effect in visual word recognition: new evidence from the English Lexicon Project.
    New B; Ferrand L; Pallier C; Brysbaert M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 16724767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Additive and interactive effects on response time distributions in visual word recognition.
    Yap MJ; Balota DA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):274-96. PubMed ID: 17352611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Lexical and semantic search in cued recall, fragment completion, perceptual identification, and recognition.
    Nelson DL; McEvoy CL; Bajo MT
    Am J Psychol; 1988; 101(4):465-80. PubMed ID: 3232723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Surviving blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition.
    Schmidtke D; Matsuki K; Kuperman V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1793-1820. PubMed ID: 28447810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Contextual dynamics in lexical encoding across the ageing spectrum: A simulation study.
    Johns BT; Taler V; Jones MN
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Sep; 76(9):2164-2182. PubMed ID: 36458499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Situated conceptualization and semantic processing: effects of emotional experience and context availability in semantic categorization and naming tasks.
    Moffat M; Siakaluk PD; Sidhu DM; Pexman PM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Apr; 22(2):408-19. PubMed ID: 25092388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The impact of feedback semantics in visual word recognition: number-of-features effects in lexical decision and naming tasks.
    Pexman PM; Lupker SJ; Hino Y
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Sep; 9(3):542-9. PubMed ID: 12412895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Distinguishing common and task-specific processes in word identification: a matter of some moment?
    Andrews S; Heathcote A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Mar; 27(2):514-44. PubMed ID: 11294447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: word frequency effects and individual differences.
    Schilling HH; Rayner K; Chumbley JI
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Nov; 26(6):1270-81. PubMed ID: 9847550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The influence of contextual diversity on word learning.
    Johns BT; Dye M; Jones MN
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Aug; 23(4):1214-20. PubMed ID: 26597891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Statistical models of morphology predict eye-tracking measures during visual word recognition.
    Lehtonen M; Varjokallio M; Kivikari H; Hultén A; Virpioja S; Hakala T; Kurimo M; Lagus K; Salmelin R
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Oct; 47(7):1245-1269. PubMed ID: 31102191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. What's in a word? A parametric study of semantic influences on visual word recognition.
    Evans GA; Lambon Ralph MA; Woollams AM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Apr; 19(2):325-31. PubMed ID: 22258820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The role of semantic transparency in visual word recognition of compound words: A megastudy approach.
    Kim SY; Yap MJ; Goh WD
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Dec; 51(6):2722-2732. PubMed ID: 30291593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Semantic richness effects in lexical decision: The role of feedback.
    Yap MJ; Lim GY; Pexman PM
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Nov; 43(8):1148-67. PubMed ID: 26155967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The complex interactions of context availability, polysemy, word frequency, and orthographic variables during lexical processing.
    Rice CA; Tokowicz N; Fraundorf SH; Liburd TL
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Oct; 47(7):1297-1313. PubMed ID: 31001796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Turning an advantage into a disadvantage: ambiguity effects in lexical decision versus reading tasks.
    Piercey CD; Joordens S
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jun; 28(4):657-66. PubMed ID: 10946548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quantifying sensorimotor experience: Body-object interaction ratings for more than 9,000 English words.
    Pexman PM; Muraki E; Sidhu DM; Siakaluk PD; Yap MJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Apr; 51(2):453-466. PubMed ID: 30484218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Attention constraints of semantic activation during visual word recognition.
    Smith MC; Bentin S; Spalek TM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Sep; 27(5):1289-98. PubMed ID: 11550755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An abundance of riches: cross-task comparisons of semantic richness effects in visual word recognition.
    Yap MJ; Pexman PM; Wellsby M; Hargreaves IS; Huff MJ
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2012; 6():72. PubMed ID: 22529787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Opposing effects of semantic diversity in lexical and semantic relatedness decisions.
    Hoffman P; Woollams AM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Apr; 41(2):385-402. PubMed ID: 25751041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.