475 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18605814)
1. Individual differences in judging deception: accuracy and bias.
Bond CF; Depaulo BM
Psychol Bull; 2008 Jul; 134(4):477-92. PubMed ID: 18605814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Home runs and humbugs: Comment on Bond and DePaulo (2008).
O'Sullivan M
Psychol Bull; 2008 Jul; 134(4):493-7; discussion 501-3. PubMed ID: 18605815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of deception judgments.
Bond CF; DePaulo BM
Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2006; 10(3):214-34. PubMed ID: 16859438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Methodological issues in meta-analyzing standard deviations: Comment on Bond and DePaulo (2008).
Pigott TD; Wu MJ
Psychol Bull; 2008 Jul; 134(4):498-500; discussion 501-3. PubMed ID: 18605816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments.
Hartwig M; Bond CF
Psychol Bull; 2011 Jul; 137(4):643-59. PubMed ID: 21707129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detecting lies in children and adults.
Edelstein RS; Luten TL; Ekman P; Goodman GS
Law Hum Behav; 2006 Feb; 30(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 16729205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The fundamental attribution error in detecting deception: the boy-who-cried-wolf effect.
O'Sullivan M
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Oct; 29(10):1316-27. PubMed ID: 15189591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Facial appearance and judgments of credibility: the effects of facial babyishness and age on statement credibility.
Masip J; Garrido E; Herrero C
Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr; 2003 Aug; 129(3):269-311. PubMed ID: 15134128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Listening, not watching: situational familiarity and the ability to detect deception.
Reinhard MA; Sporer SL; Scharmach M; Marksteiner T
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Sep; 101(3):467-84. PubMed ID: 21707196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Are lies more wrong than errors? Accuracy judgments of inaccurate statements.
Teigen KH; Filkuková P
Scand J Psychol; 2011 Feb; 52(1):8-20. PubMed ID: 21054418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is It the Judge, the Sender, or Just the Individual Message? Disentangling Person and Message Effects on Variation in Lie-Detection Judgments.
Volz S; Reinhard MA; Müller P
Perspect Psychol Sci; 2023 Nov; 18(6):1368-1387. PubMed ID: 36791692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Heuristic versus systematic processing of information in detecting deception: questioning the truth bias.
Masip J; Garrido E; Herrero C
Psychol Rep; 2009 Aug; 105(1):11-36. PubMed ID: 19810430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. It's the deceiver, not the receiver: No individual differences when detecting deception in a foreign and a native language.
Law MKH; Jackson SA; Aidman E; Geiger M; Olderbak S; Kleitman S
PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0196384. PubMed ID: 29723243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Some Evidence That Truth-Tellers Are More Attractive Than Liars.
Ten Brinke L; Raymundo I; Mukherjee M; Carney DR
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2023 Oct; ():1461672231207567. PubMed ID: 37888143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Age-related differences in deception.
Ruffman T; Murray J; Halberstadt J; Vater T
Psychol Aging; 2012 Sep; 27(3):543-9. PubMed ID: 21463058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adults' ability to detect children's lying.
Crossman AM; Lewis M
Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(5):703-15. PubMed ID: 17016813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can Ordinary People Detect Deception After All?
Ten Brinke L; Vohs KD; Carney DR
Trends Cogn Sci; 2016 Aug; 20(8):579-588. PubMed ID: 27353575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An empirical test of the decision to lie component of the Activation-Decision-Construction-Action Theory (ADCAT).
Masip J; Blandón-Gitlin I; de la Riva C; Herrero C
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Sep; 169():45-55. PubMed ID: 27219533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Unconscious processes improve lie detection.
Reinhard MA; Greifeneder R; Scharmach M
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Nov; 105(5):721-39. PubMed ID: 24219784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detecting deception in children: A meta-analysis.
Gongola J; Scurich N; Quas JA
Law Hum Behav; 2017 Feb; 41(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 27685642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
