BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18605815)

  • 1. Home runs and humbugs: Comment on Bond and DePaulo (2008).
    O'Sullivan M
    Psychol Bull; 2008 Jul; 134(4):493-7; discussion 501-3. PubMed ID: 18605815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Methodological issues in meta-analyzing standard deviations: Comment on Bond and DePaulo (2008).
    Pigott TD; Wu MJ
    Psychol Bull; 2008 Jul; 134(4):498-500; discussion 501-3. PubMed ID: 18605816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Individual differences in judging deception: accuracy and bias.
    Bond CF; Depaulo BM
    Psychol Bull; 2008 Jul; 134(4):477-92. PubMed ID: 18605814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments.
    Hartwig M; Bond CF
    Psychol Bull; 2011 Jul; 137(4):643-59. PubMed ID: 21707129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Police lie detection accuracy: the effect of lie scenario.
    O'Sullivan M; Frank MG; Hurley CM; Tiwana J
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Dec; 33(6):530-8. PubMed ID: 19242785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Unicorns or Tiger Woods: are lie detection experts myths or rarities? A response to on lie detection "wizards" by Bond and Uysal.
    O'Sullivan M
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Feb; 31(1):117-23. PubMed ID: 17221308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An empirical test of the behaviour analysis interview.
    Vrij A; Mann S; Fisher RP
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Jun; 30(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 16718581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. It's the deceiver, not the receiver: No individual differences when detecting deception in a foreign and a native language.
    Law MKH; Jackson SA; Aidman E; Geiger M; Olderbak S; Kleitman S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0196384. PubMed ID: 29723243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of deception judgments.
    Bond CF; DePaulo BM
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2006; 10(3):214-34. PubMed ID: 16859438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can Ordinary People Detect Deception After All?
    Ten Brinke L; Vohs KD; Carney DR
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2016 Aug; 20(8):579-588. PubMed ID: 27353575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The fundamental attribution error in detecting deception: the boy-who-cried-wolf effect.
    O'Sullivan M
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Oct; 29(10):1316-27. PubMed ID: 15189591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unconscious processes improve lie detection.
    Reinhard MA; Greifeneder R; Scharmach M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Nov; 105(5):721-39. PubMed ID: 24219784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An empirical test of the decision to lie component of the Activation-Decision-Construction-Action Theory (ADCAT).
    Masip J; Blandón-Gitlin I; de la Riva C; Herrero C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Sep; 169():45-55. PubMed ID: 27219533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The reliability of lie detection performance.
    Leach AM; Lindsay RC; Koehler R; Beaudry JL; Bala NC; Lee K; Talwar V
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Feb; 33(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 18594955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Deception detection from written accounts.
    Masip J; Bethencourt M; Lucas G; Sánchez-San Segundo M; Herrero C
    Scand J Psychol; 2012 Apr; 53(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 22221194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On lie detection "wizards".
    Bond CF; Uysal A
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Feb; 31(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 17221309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Strategic use of evidence during police interviews: when training to detect deception works.
    Hartwig M; Granhag PA; Strömwall LA; Kronkvist O
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Oct; 30(5):603-19. PubMed ID: 16977348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Facial appearance and judgments of credibility: the effects of facial babyishness and age on statement credibility.
    Masip J; Garrido E; Herrero C
    Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr; 2003 Aug; 129(3):269-311. PubMed ID: 15134128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Different physiological reactions when observing lies versus truths: Initial evidence and an intervention to enhance accuracy.
    Ten Brinke L; Lee JJ; Carney DR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Sep; 117(3):560-578. PubMed ID: 30869984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Group discussion improves lie detection.
    Klein N; Epley N
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Jun; 112(24):7460-5. PubMed ID: 26015581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.