These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18605866)

  • 21. Recollection is a continuous process: implications for dual-process theories of recognition memory.
    Mickes L; Wais PE; Wixted JT
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Apr; 20(4):509-15. PubMed ID: 19320859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The development of recollection and familiarity in childhood and adolescence: evidence from the dual-process signal detection model.
    Ghetti S; Angelini L
    Child Dev; 2008; 79(2):339-58. PubMed ID: 18366427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The hippocampus operates in a threshold manner during spatial source memory.
    Slotnick SD; Thakral PP
    Neuroreport; 2013 Mar; 24(5):265-9. PubMed ID: 23407277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: a complementary-learning-systems approach.
    Norman KA; O'Reilly RC
    Psychol Rev; 2003 Oct; 110(4):611-46. PubMed ID: 14599236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition and source-memory judgments: a formal dual-process model and an analysis of receiver operating characteristics.
    Yonelinas AP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1999 Nov; 25(6):1415-34. PubMed ID: 10605829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Modeling associative recognition: a comparison of two-high-threshold, two-high-threshold signal detection, and mixture distribution models.
    Macho S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jan; 30(1):83-97. PubMed ID: 14736298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bilateral damage to the mammillo-thalamic tract impairs recollection but not familiarity in the recognition process: a single case investigation.
    Carlesimo GA; Serra L; Fadda L; Cherubini A; Bozzali M; Caltagirone C
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jun; 45(11):2467-79. PubMed ID: 17512561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Do changes in the subjective experience of recognition over time suggest independent processes?
    Tunney RJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Feb; 63(Pt 1):43-62. PubMed ID: 19341516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. ROC parameters in item and context recognition.
    Algarabel S; Pitarque A
    Psicothema; 2007 Feb; 19(1):163-70. PubMed ID: 17295999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The nature of recollection in behavior and the brain.
    Slotnick SD
    Neuroreport; 2013 Aug; 24(12):663-70. PubMed ID: 23719019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. ROCs in recognition with and without identification.
    Cleary AM
    Memory; 2005 Jul; 13(5):472-83. PubMed ID: 16020377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. FMRI signals associated with memory strength in the medial temporal lobes: a meta-analysis.
    Wais PE
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Dec; 46(14):3185-96. PubMed ID: 18817791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Item recognition memory and the receiver operating characteristic.
    Heathcote A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1210-30. PubMed ID: 14622056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of familiarity level and repetition on recognition accuracy.
    Tussing AA; Greene RL
    Am J Psychol; 2001; 114(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 11258228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Recognition ROCs are curvilinear-or are they? On premature arguments against the two-high-threshold model of recognition.
    Bröder A; Schütz J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):587-606. PubMed ID: 19379038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Separating mnemonic process from participant and item effects in the assessment of ROC asymmetries.
    Pratte MS; Rouder JN; Morey RD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):224-32. PubMed ID: 20053058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: the contribution of recollection and familiarity.
    Yonelinas AP
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Nov; 25(6):747-63. PubMed ID: 9421560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Recognition memory: a review of the critical findings and an integrated theory for relating them.
    Malmberg KJ
    Cogn Psychol; 2008 Dec; 57(4):335-84. PubMed ID: 18485339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Associative reinstatement: a novel approach to assessing associative memory in patients with unilateral temporal lobe excisions.
    Cohn M; McAndrews MP; Moscovitch M
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Nov; 47(13):2989-94. PubMed ID: 19591854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Recollection and familiarity exhibit dissociable similarity gradients: a test of the complementary learning systems model.
    Elfman KW; Yonelinas AP
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 May; 27(5):876-92. PubMed ID: 25390205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.