BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18605876)

  • 1. Capacity demands of phoneme selection in word production: new evidence from dual-task experiments.
    Cook AE; Meyer AS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jul; 34(4):886-99. PubMed ID: 18605876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tracing attention and the activation flow of spoken word planning using eye movements.
    Roelofs A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):353-68. PubMed ID: 18315411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influences of spoken word planning on speech recognition.
    Roelofs A; Ozdemir R; Levelt WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):900-13. PubMed ID: 17723068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Phonological facilitation from pictures in a word association task: evidence for routine cascaded processing in spoken word production.
    Humphreys KR; Boyd CH; Watter S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Dec; 63(12):2289-96. PubMed ID: 20737355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Processing segmental and prosodic information in Cantonese word production.
    Wong AW; Chen HC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1172-90. PubMed ID: 18763899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production.
    Ferreira VS; Pashler H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Nov; 28(6):1187-99. PubMed ID: 12450341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The word frequency effect in picture naming: contrasting two hypotheses using homonym pictures.
    Shatzman KB; Schiller NO
    Brain Lang; 2004; 90(1-3):160-9. PubMed ID: 15172534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Priming effects from phonologically related distractors in picture-word interference.
    Jescheniak JD; Schriefers H
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 May; 54(2):371-82. PubMed ID: 11394052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The representation of homophones: evidence from the distractor-frequency effect.
    Miozzo M; Caramazza A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Nov; 31(6):1360-71. PubMed ID: 16393051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phonological neighbors influence word naming through the least supported phoneme.
    Yates M; Friend J; Ploetz DM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1599-608. PubMed ID: 19045995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Semantic competition between hierarchically related words during speech planning.
    Hantsch A; Jescheniak JD; Schriefers H
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Sep; 33(6):984-1000. PubMed ID: 16496720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attention, gaze shifting, and dual-task interference from phonological encoding in spoken word planning.
    Roelofs A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1580-98. PubMed ID: 19045994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age of acquisition and word frequency effects in picture naming: a dual-task investigation.
    Dent K; Johnston RA; Humphreys GW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):282-301. PubMed ID: 18315406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inhibitory effects during object name retrieval: the effect of interval between prime and target on picture naming responses.
    Vitkovitch M; Rutter C; Read A
    Br J Psychol; 2001 Aug; 92(Pt 3):483-506. PubMed ID: 11534741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Concurrent processing of words and their replacements during speech.
    Hartsuiker RJ; Catchpole CM; de Jong NH; Pickering MJ
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):601-7. PubMed ID: 18547556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Grammatical and nongrammatical contributions to closed-class word selection.
    Alario FX; Ayora P; Costa A; Melinger A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jul; 34(4):960-81. PubMed ID: 18605881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does word length affect speech onset latencies when producing single words?
    Damian MF; Bowers JS; Stadthagen-Gonzalez H; Spalek K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):892-905. PubMed ID: 20565208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exploring the dynamics of aphasic word production using the picture-word interference task: a case study.
    Wilshire CE; Keall LM; Stuart EJ; O'Donnell DJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(5):939-53. PubMed ID: 17141812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Orthographic and phonological facilitation in speech production: new evidence from picture naming in Chinese.
    Zhao H; La Heij W; Schiller NO
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Feb; 139(2):272-80. PubMed ID: 22305348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How lingering representations of abandoned context words affect speech production.
    Tydgat I; Diependaele K; Hartsuiker RJ; Pickering MJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Jul; 140(3):218-29. PubMed ID: 22673067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.