These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18605878)

  • 1. Correcting a metacognitive error: feedback increases retention of low-confidence correct responses.
    Butler AC; Karpicke JD; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jul; 34(4):918-28. PubMed ID: 18605878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Learning from feedback: Spacing and the delay-retention effect.
    Smith TA; Kimball DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):80-95. PubMed ID: 20053046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests.
    Butler AC; Karpicke JD; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2007 Dec; 13(4):273-81. PubMed ID: 18194050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying.
    Butler AC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1118-33. PubMed ID: 20804289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention.
    Roediger HL; Karpicke JD
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Mar; 17(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 16507066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Memorial consequences of answering SAT II questions.
    Marsh EJ; Agarwal PK; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 19309212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier.
    Halamish V; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):801-12. PubMed ID: 21480751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When does feedback facilitate learning of words?
    Pashler H; Cepeda NJ; Wixted JT; Rohrer D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jan; 31(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 15641900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Beyond hypercorrection: remembering corrective feedback for low-confidence errors.
    Griffiths L; Higham PA
    Memory; 2018 Feb; 26(2):201-218. PubMed ID: 28671026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fact learning: how information accuracy, delay, and repeated testing change retention and retrieval experience.
    Barber SJ; Rajaram S; Marsh EJ
    Memory; 2008 Nov; 16(8):934-46. PubMed ID: 18949663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Metacognitive control and strategy selection: deciding to practice retrieval during learning.
    Karpicke JD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Nov; 138(4):469-86. PubMed ID: 19883131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The positive and negative consequences of multiple-choice testing.
    Roediger HL; Marsh EJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Sep; 31(5):1155-9. PubMed ID: 16248758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The testing effect in recognition memory: a dual process account.
    Chan JC; McDermott KB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):431-7. PubMed ID: 17352622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Metamemory accuracy: effects of feedback and the stability of individual differences.
    Thompson WB
    Am J Psychol; 1998; 111(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 9624702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Postidentification feedback affects subsequent eyewitness identification performance.
    Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Dec; 16(4):387-98. PubMed ID: 21198255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transfer-appropriate processing in the testing effect.
    Veltre MT; Cho KW; Neely JH
    Memory; 2015; 23(8):1229-37. PubMed ID: 25345914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. "None of the above" as a correct and incorrect alternative on a multiple-choice test: implications for the testing effect.
    Odegard TN; Koen JD
    Memory; 2007 Nov; 15(8):873-85. PubMed ID: 17965982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metamemory judgments and the benefits of repeated study: improving recall predictions through the activation of appropriate knowledge.
    Tiede HL; Leboe JP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):822-8. PubMed ID: 19379052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Effect of Type of Feedback in Multiple-Choice Testing on Long-Term Retention.
    Jang Y; Marshall E
    J Gen Psychol; 2018; 145(2):107-119. PubMed ID: 29547068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Expanding retrieval practice promotes short-term retention, but equally spaced retrieval enhances long-term retention.
    Karpicke JD; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jul; 33(4):704-19. PubMed ID: 17576148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.