These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18605921)

  • 1. Inverse finite element characterization of the human myometrium derived from uniaxial compression experiments.
    Weiss S; Niederer P; Nava A; Caduff R; Bajka M
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2008 Apr; 53(2):52-8. PubMed ID: 18605921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The nonlinear material properties of liver tissue determined from no-slip uniaxial compression experiments.
    Roan E; Vemaganti K
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Jun; 129(3):450-6. PubMed ID: 17536913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characterization of human passive muscles for impact loads using genetic algorithm and inverse finite element methods.
    Chawla A; Mukherjee S; Karthikeyan B
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2009 Feb; 8(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 18293021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Calibration of hyperelastic material properties of the human lumbar intervertebral disc under fast dynamic compressive loads.
    Wagnac E; Arnoux PJ; Garo A; El-Rich M; Aubin CE
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 Oct; 133(10):101007. PubMed ID: 22070332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
    Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stochastic finite element analysis of biological systems: comparison of a simple intervertebral disc model with experimental results.
    Espino DM; Meakin JR; Hukins DW; Reid JE
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2003 Aug; 6(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 12959758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Liver tissue characterization from uniaxial stress-strain data using probabilistic and inverse finite element methods.
    Fu YB; Chui CK; Teo CL
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 Apr; 20():105-12. PubMed ID: 23455167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Compressive properties of mouse articular cartilage determined in a novel micro-indentation test method and biphasic finite element model.
    Cao L; Youn I; Guilak F; Setton LA
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Oct; 128(5):766-71. PubMed ID: 16995764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional finite element models of the human pubic symphysis with viscohyperelastic soft tissues.
    Li Z; Alonso JE; Kim JE; Davidson JS; Etheridge BS; Eberhardt AW
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 34(9):1452-62. PubMed ID: 16897423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contribution of inter-site variations in architecture to trabecular bone apparent yield strains.
    Morgan EF; Bayraktar HH; Yeh OC; Majumdar S; Burghardt A; Keaveny TM
    J Biomech; 2004 Sep; 37(9):1413-20. PubMed ID: 15275849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating material parameters of human skin in vivo.
    Kvistedal YA; Nielsen PM
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2009 Feb; 8(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 18040732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A transversely isotropic hyperelastic constitutive model of the PDL. Analytical and computational aspects.
    Limbert G; Middleton J; Laizans J; Dobelis M; Knets I
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2003; 6(5-6):337-45. PubMed ID: 14675954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of a finite element model of the human metacarpal.
    Barker DS; Netherway DJ; Krishnan J; Hearn TC
    Med Eng Phys; 2005 Mar; 27(2):103-13. PubMed ID: 15642506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel two-layer, coupled finite element approach for modeling the nonlinear elastic and viscoelastic behavior of human erythrocytes.
    Klöppel T; Wall WA
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2011 Jul; 10(4):445-59. PubMed ID: 20725846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Viscoelastic characterization of the porcine temporomandibular joint disc under unconfined compression.
    Allen KD; Athanasiou KA
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(2):312-22. PubMed ID: 16321633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurement and characterization of soft tissue behavior with surface deformation and force response under large deformations.
    Ahn B; Kim J
    Med Image Anal; 2010 Apr; 14(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 19948423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A visco-hyperelastic-damage constitutive model for the analysis of the biomechanical response of the periodontal ligament.
    Natali AN; Carniel EL; Pavan PG; Sander FG; Dorow C; Geiger M
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Jun; 130(3):031004. PubMed ID: 18532853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of damage on the viscoelastic behavior of human vertebral trabecular bone.
    Bredbenner TL; Davy DT
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Aug; 128(4):473-80. PubMed ID: 16813438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of strain rate on the mechanical properties of human cortical bone.
    Hansen U; Zioupos P; Simpson R; Currey JD; Hynd D
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Feb; 130(1):011011. PubMed ID: 18298187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of large compression loads on lumbar spine in flexion and in torsion using a novel wrapping element.
    Shirazi-Adl A
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(2):267-75. PubMed ID: 16321628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.