250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18606745)
1. The reliability of computed tomography (CT) values and dimensional measurements of the oropharyngeal region using cone beam CT: comparison with multidetector CT.
Yamashina A; Tanimoto K; Sutthiprapaporn P; Hayakawa Y
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):245-51. PubMed ID: 18606745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of intensity variability in multislice and cone beam computed tomography.
Nackaerts O; Maes F; Yan H; Couto Souza P; Pauwels R; Jacobs R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Aug; 22(8):873-9. PubMed ID: 21244502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of surrounding conditions on pixel value of cone beam computed tomography.
Araki K; Okano T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):862-5. PubMed ID: 22092375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of MDCT and CBCT in three-dimensional evaluation of the oropharynx morphology.
Chen H; van Eijnatten M; Aarab G; Forouzanfar T; de Lange J; van der Stelt P; Lobbezoo F; Wolff J
Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jan; 40(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 28453722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography versus conventional multidetector computed tomography for image-guided craniofacial implant planning: An in vitro study.
Dings JP; Verhamme L; Merkx MA; Xi T; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):665–672. PubMed ID: 30934042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A quality assurance framework for the fully automated and objective evaluation of image quality in cone-beam computed tomography.
Steiding C; Kolditz D; Kalender WA
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031901. PubMed ID: 24593719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Investigation on the 3 D geometric accuracy and on the image quality (MTF, SNR and NPS) of volume tomography units (CT, CBCT and DVT)].
Blendl C; Fiebich M; Voigt JM; Selbach M; Uphoff C
Rofo; 2012 Jan; 184(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 22076796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computed gray levels in multislice and cone-beam computed tomography.
Azeredo F; de Menezes LM; Enciso R; Weissheimer A; de Oliveira RB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jul; 144(1):147-55. PubMed ID: 23810056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation between pixel values in a cone-beam computed tomographic scanner and the computed tomographic values in a multidetector row computed tomographic scanner.
Chindasombatjaroen J; Kakimoto N; Shimamoto H; Murakami S; Furukawa S
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(5):662-5. PubMed ID: 21926866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
Moshiri M; Scarfe WC; Hilgers ML; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):550-60. PubMed ID: 17920510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Image quality assessment of three cone beam CT machines using the SEDENTEXCT CT phantom.
Bamba J; Araki K; Endo A; Okano T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(8):20120445. PubMed ID: 23956235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cranial base foramen location accuracy and reliability in cone-beam computerized tomography.
Lagravère MO; Gordon JM; Flores-Mir C; Carey J; Heo G; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Mar; 139(3):e203-10. PubMed ID: 21392663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between multislice and cone-beam computerized tomography in the volumetric assessment of cleft palate.
Albuquerque MA; Gaia BF; Cavalcanti MG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Aug; 112(2):249-57. PubMed ID: 21664153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dose and image quality of cone-beam computed tomography as compared with conventional multislice computed tomography in abdominal imaging.
Schegerer AA; Lechel U; Ritter M; Weisser G; Fink C; Brix G
Invest Radiol; 2014 Oct; 49(10):675-84. PubMed ID: 24853071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability and accuracy of three imaging software packages used for 3D analysis of the upper airway on cone beam computed tomography images.
Chen H; van Eijnatten M; Wolff J; de Lange J; van der Stelt PF; Lobbezoo F; Aarab G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Aug; 46(6):20170043. PubMed ID: 28467118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy and validity of stitching sectional cone beam computed tomographic images.
Kim MK; Kang SH; Lee EH; Lee SH; Park W
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 23(4):1071-6. PubMed ID: 22777443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of image quality in soft tissue and bone visualization tasks for a dedicated extremity cone-beam CT system.
Demehri S; Muhit A; Zbijewski W; Stayman JW; Yorkston J; Packard N; Senn R; Yang D; Foos D; Thawait GK; Fayad LM; Chhabra A; Carrino JA; Siewerdsen JH
Eur Radiol; 2015 Jun; 25(6):1742-51. PubMed ID: 25599933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and medical computed tomography: implications for clinical diagnostics with guided surgery.
Abboud M; Calvo-Guirado JL; Orentlicher G; Wahl G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):536-42. PubMed ID: 23527357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating craniofacial asymmetry with digital cephalometric images and cone-beam computed tomography.
de Moraes ME; Hollender LG; Chen CS; Moraes LC; Balducci I
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jun; 139(6):e523-31. PubMed ID: 21640864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dimensional error of three-dimensional images generated by different software.
Pimentel PA; Bomfim RT; Andrade LC; Ferraz EG; Ribeiro Lamberti PL; Rubira-Bullen IR; Sarmento VA
J Med Eng Technol; 2015; 39(8):480-4. PubMed ID: 26200519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
