These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1860759)

  • 1. Use of biostereometric analysis as a screen for breast cancer.
    Loughry CW; Sheffer DB; Price TE; Morek WM; Einsporn RL
    Invest Radiol; 1991 Jun; 26(6):528-33. PubMed ID: 1860759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breast volume measurement of 248 women using biostereometric analysis.
    Loughry CW; Sheffer DB; Price TE; Lackney MJ; Bartfai RG; Morek WM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1987 Oct; 80(4):553-8. PubMed ID: 3659165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast cancer detection utilizing biostereometric analysis.
    Loughry CW; Sheffer DB; Hamor RH; Herron RE; Liebelt RA; Proietti-Orlandi F; Varga RS
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1981; 4(1-4):589-94. PubMed ID: 7349825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers.
    Mandelson MT; Oestreicher N; Porter PL; White D; Finder CA; Taplin SH; White E
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Jul; 92(13):1081-7. PubMed ID: 10880551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
    Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
    Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age-specific effectiveness of the Nijmegen population-based breast cancer-screening program: assessment of early indicators of screening effectiveness.
    Peer PG; Holland R; Hendriks JH; Mravunac M; Verbeek AL
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1994 Mar; 86(6):436-41. PubMed ID: 8120918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biostereometric analysis for breast cancer detection.
    Proietti-Orlandi F; Varga RS; Sheffer DB; Price TE; Loughry CW
    J Biomed Eng; 1988 May; 10(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 3392975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Specificity of screening in United Kingdom trial of early detection of breast cancer.
    BMJ; 1992 Feb; 304(6823):346-9. PubMed ID: 1540731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Magnetic resonance imaging screening of the contralateral breast in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of incremental cancer detection and impact on surgical management.
    Brennan ME; Houssami N; Lord S; Macaskill P; Irwig L; Dixon JM; Warren RM; Ciatto S
    J Clin Oncol; 2009 Nov; 27(33):5640-9. PubMed ID: 19805685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minority report - false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis.
    Ciatto S; Houssami N; Ambrogetti D; Bonardi R; Collini G; Del Turco MR
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 105(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17115112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The added value of mammography in different age-groups of women with and without BRCA mutation screened with breast MRI.
    Vreemann S; van Zelst JCM; Schlooz-Vries M; Bult P; Hoogerbrugge N; Karssemeijer N; Gubern-Mérida A; Mann RM
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Aug; 20(1):84. PubMed ID: 30075794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Population screening for breast cancer by mammography in The Netherlands. Expectations, early results, negative effects and conditions for large-scale screening.
    Hendriks JH; Verbeek AL
    Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1985; 54(3-4):186-91. PubMed ID: 3896616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors Associated With Rates of False-Positive and False-Negative Results From Digital Mammography Screening: An Analysis of Registry Data.
    Nelson HD; O'Meara ES; Kerlikowske K; Balch S; Miglioretti D
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):226-35. PubMed ID: 26756902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast screening results from a healthy working population.
    Hutchison J; Tucker AK
    Clin Oncol; 1984 Jun; 10(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 6734004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
    May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of false negative rates among breast cancer screening modalities with or without mammography: Miyagi trial.
    Ohuchi N; Yoshida K; Kimura M; Ouchi A; Shiiba K; Ohnuki K; Fukao A; Abe R; Matsuno S; Mori S
    Jpn J Cancer Res; 1995 May; 86(5):501-6. PubMed ID: 7790323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast volume measurement of 598 women using biostereometric analysis.
    Loughry CW; Sheffer DB; Price TE; Einsporn RL; Bartfai RG; Morek WM; Meli NM
    Ann Plast Surg; 1989 May; 22(5):380-5. PubMed ID: 2729845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validity and reliability of biostereometric measurement of the human female breast.
    Sheffer DB; Price TE; Loughry CW; Bolyard BL; Morek WM; Varga RS
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1986; 14(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 3706852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The comparative value of mammographic screening for women 40-49 years old versus women 50-64 years old.
    Curpen BN; Sickles EA; Sollitto RA; Ominsky SH; Galvin HB; Frankel SD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1099-103. PubMed ID: 7717212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Second round cancers: how many were visible on the first round of the UK National Breast Screening Programme, three years earlier?
    Daly CA; Apthorp L; Field S
    Clin Radiol; 1998 Jan; 53(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 9464431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.