These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18607679)

  • 21. Rate, Timing, Correlates, and Outcomes of Hemodynamic Valve Deterioration After Bioprosthetic Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Salaun E; Mahjoub H; Girerd N; Dagenais F; Voisine P; Mohammadi S; Yanagawa B; Kalavrouziotis D; Juni P; Verma S; Puri R; Coté N; Rodés-Cabau J; Mathieu P; Clavel MA; Pibarot P
    Circulation; 2018 Sep; 138(10):971-985. PubMed ID: 30354532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prevalence and Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Following Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Pure Aortic Regurgitation.
    Auffret V; Voisine P; Cinq-Mars A; Charbonneau É; Le Ven F; Dubois-Sénéchal SM; Brenna E; Dagenais F; Dubois M; Ridard C; Sénéchal M
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2016 Sep; 25(5):543-551. PubMed ID: 28238235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Limitations in the Assessment of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch.
    Amorim PA; Diab M; Walther M; Färber G; Hagendorff A; Bonow RO; Doenst T
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Oct; 68(7):550-556. PubMed ID: 30609446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on intermediate-term outcome and regression of left ventricular mass following aortic valve replacement with mechanical prosthesis.
    Tao K; Sakata R; Iguro Y; Ueno M; Tanaka Y; Otsuji Y; Tei C
    J Card Surg; 2007; 22(6):486-92. PubMed ID: 18039208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Factors affecting left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with stentless valves.
    Del Rizzo DF; Abdoh A; Cartier P; Doty D; Westaby S
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1999 Oct; 11(4 Suppl 1):114-20. PubMed ID: 10660178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation in degenerated bioprostheses.
    Seiffert M; Conradi L; Baldus S; Knap M; Schirmer J; Franzen O; Koschyk D; Meinertz T; Reichenspurner H; Treede H
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Mar; 143(3):617-24. PubMed ID: 22169448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Impact of Pre-Existing Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch on Survival Following Aortic Valve-in-Valve Procedures.
    Pibarot P; Simonato M; Barbanti M; Linke A; Kornowski R; Rudolph T; Spence M; Moat N; Aldea G; Mennuni M; Iadanza A; Amrane H; Gaia D; Kim WK; Napodano M; Baumbach H; Finkelstein A; Kobayashi J; Brecker S; Don C; Cerillo A; Unbehaun A; Attias D; Nejjari M; Jones N; Fiorina C; Tchetche D; Philippart R; Spargias K; Hernandez JM; Latib A; Dvir D
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jan; 11(2):133-141. PubMed ID: 29348008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Does a minimally invasive approach increase the incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch in aortic valve replacement?
    Bakir I; Casselman FP; Onan B; Van Praet F; Vermeulen Y; Degrieck I
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 Mar; 23(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 25076545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mid-term results of small-sized St. Jude Medical Regent prosthetic valves (21 mm or less) for small aortic annulus.
    Mizoguchi H; Sakaki M; Inoue K; Iwata T; Tei K; Miura T
    Heart Vessels; 2013 Nov; 28(6):769-74. PubMed ID: 23160858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparative study of surgical treatment of small aortic root with or without aortic root enlargement using a single prosthesis type.
    Prakash S; Agarwal S; Dutta N; Satsangi DK
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2010 Nov; 11(11):836-42. PubMed ID: 20739902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on the regression of secondary mitral regurgitation after isolated aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthetic valve in patients with severe aortic stenosis.
    Angeloni E; Melina G; Pibarot P; Benedetto U; Refice S; Ciavarella GM; Roscitano A; Sinatra R; Pepper JR
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Jan; 5(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22138006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of patient-prosthesis mismatch on long-term results after aortic valve replacement with a stented bioprosthesis.
    Frapier JM; Rouvière P; Razcka F; Aymard T; Albat B; Chaptal PA
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jul; 11(4):543-51. PubMed ID: 12150304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement: a retrospective analysis in East China.
    Guo L; Zheng J; Chen L; Li R; Ma L; Ni Y; Zhao H
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2017 May; 12(1):42. PubMed ID: 28545592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Early clinical and haemodynamic results after aortic valve replacement with the Freedom SOLO bioprosthesis (experience of Italian multicenter study).
    Repossini A; Rambaldini M; Lucchetti V; Da Col U; Cesari F; Mignosa C; Picano E; Glauber M
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2012 May; 41(5):1104-10. PubMed ID: 22315358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement: influence of age, obesity, and left ventricular dysfunction.
    Mohty D; Dumesnil JG; Echahidi N; Mathieu P; Dagenais F; Voisine P; Pibarot P
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Jan; 53(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 19118723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The St Jude Medical Trifecta aortic pericardial valve: results from a global, multicenter, prospective clinical study.
    Bavaria JE; Desai ND; Cheung A; Petracek MR; Groh MA; Borger MA; Schaff HV
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Feb; 147(2):590-7. PubMed ID: 23477687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comprehensive hemodynamic performance and frequency of patient-prosthesis mismatch of the St. Jude Medical Trifecta bioprosthetic aortic valve.
    Yadlapati A; Diep J; Barnes MJ; Grogan T; Bethencourt DM; Vorobiof G
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 Jul; 23(4):516-23. PubMed ID: 25803979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Imaging for Predicting and Assessing Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Pibarot P; Magne J; Leipsic J; Côté N; Blanke P; Thourani VH; Hahn R
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Jan; 12(1):149-162. PubMed ID: 30621987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Relationship between prosthesis-patient mismatch and pro-brain natriuretic peptides after aortic valve replacement.
    Melina G; Angeloni E; Benedetto U; Refice S; Miceli A; Miele C; Ciavarella GM; Sinatra R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2010 Mar; 19(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 20369499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with the new Mitroflow 12A pericardial bioprosthesis.
    García-Bengochea J; Sierra J; González-Juanatey JR; Rubio J; Vega M; Fernández AL; Sánchez D
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 May; 15(3):446-51; discussion 451-2. PubMed ID: 16784087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.