These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18607709)

  • 1. Assessing the propensity for sexual coaxing and coercion in relationships: factor structure, reliability, and validity of the tactics to obtain sex scale.
    Camilleri JA; Quinsey VL; Tapscott JL
    Arch Sex Behav; 2009 Dec; 38(6):959-73. PubMed ID: 18607709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The sexual self-consciousness scale: psychometric properties.
    van Lankveld JJ; Geijen WE; Sykora H
    Arch Sex Behav; 2008 Dec; 37(6):925-33. PubMed ID: 18046638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sexual coercion in men and women: similar behaviors, different predictors.
    Schatzel-Murphy EA; Harris DA; Knight RA; Milburn MA
    Arch Sex Behav; 2009 Dec; 38(6):974-86. PubMed ID: 19330440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability and validity of the sexual pressure scale.
    Jones R
    Res Nurs Health; 2006 Aug; 29(4):281-93. PubMed ID: 16847908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The associations among dark personalities and sexual tactics across different scenarios.
    Jones DN; Olderbak SG
    J Interpers Violence; 2014 Apr; 29(6):1050-70. PubMed ID: 24288187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Going along with it: sexually coercive partner behavior predicts dating women's compliance with unwanted sex.
    Katz J; Tirone V
    Violence Against Women; 2010 Jul; 16(7):730-42. PubMed ID: 20558767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual differences in the propensity for partner sexual coercion.
    Camilleri JA; Quinsey VL
    Sex Abuse; 2009 Mar; 21(1):111-29. PubMed ID: 19218481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictors of sexual coercion against women and men: a multilevel, multinational study of university students.
    Hines DA
    Arch Sex Behav; 2007 Jun; 36(3):403-22. PubMed ID: 17333324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of Acceptance of Coercive Sexual Behavior (ACSB): a multimedia measure of adolescent dating attitudes.
    Teten AL; Hall GC; Pacifici C
    Assessment; 2005 Jun; 12(2):162-73. PubMed ID: 15914718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sexual coercion in intimate relationships: a comparative analysis of the effects of women's infidelity and men's dominance and control.
    Goetz AT; Shackelford TK
    Arch Sex Behav; 2009 Apr; 38(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 18415011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceived conflict patterns and relationship quality associated with verbal sexual coercion by male dating partners.
    Katz J; Myhr L
    J Interpers Violence; 2008 Jun; 23(6):798-814. PubMed ID: 18272722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Positive and negative cognitions of sexual submission: relationship to sexual violence.
    Renaud CA; Byers SE
    Arch Sex Behav; 2006 Aug; 35(4):483-90. PubMed ID: 16909319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The partner-specific sexual liking and sexual wanting scale: psychometric properties.
    Krishnamurti T; Loewenstein G
    Arch Sex Behav; 2012 Apr; 41(2):467-76. PubMed ID: 21720917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The development and psychometric assessment of the adolescent sexual coercion risk scale.
    Bramsen RH; Lasgaard M; Elklit A; Koss MP
    J Interpers Violence; 2011 May; 26(8):1524-40. PubMed ID: 20971707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Sexual Compulsivity Scale: further development and use with HIV-positive persons.
    Kalichman SC; Rompa D
    J Pers Assess; 2001 Jun; 76(3):379-95. PubMed ID: 11499453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Validation study of the Depressive Experience Questionnaire].
    Atger F; Frasson G; Loas G; Guibourgé S; Corcos M; Perez Diaz F; Speranza M; Venisse JL; Lang F; Stephan P; Bizouard P; Flament M; Jeammet P
    Encephale; 2003; 29(5):445-55. PubMed ID: 14615694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patterns of sexual coercion in heterosexual and non-heterosexual men and women.
    VanderLaan DP; Vasey PL
    Arch Sex Behav; 2009 Dec; 38(6):987-99. PubMed ID: 19219543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A study of the prevalence of sexual coercion in adolescent heterosexual dating relationships in a Quebec sample.
    Poitras M; Lavoie F
    Violence Vict; 1995; 10(4):299-313. PubMed ID: 8703842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The sexual consent scale-revised: development, reliability, and preliminary validity.
    Humphreys TP; Brousseau MM
    J Sex Res; 2010 Sep; 47(5):420-8. PubMed ID: 19685367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sexually coercive tactics used by university students: a clear role for primary psychopathy.
    Muñoz LC; Khan R; Cordwell L
    J Pers Disord; 2011 Feb; 25(1):28-40. PubMed ID: 21309621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.