These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18607801)

  • 1. On statistical evaluation of the linearity in assay validation.
    Hsieh E; Liu JP
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(4):677-90. PubMed ID: 18607801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical inference for the within-device precision of quantitative measurements in assay validation.
    Liu JP; Lu LT; Liao CT
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Sep; 19(5):763-78. PubMed ID: 20183442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An alternative approach to evaluation of poolability for stability studies.
    Liu JP; Tung SC; Pong YM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2006; 16(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 16440833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tests of equivalence and non-inferiority for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired areas under ROC curves.
    Liu JP; Ma MC; Wu CY; Tai JY
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1219-38. PubMed ID: 16158400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tests for equivalence based on odds ratio for matched-pair design.
    Liu JP; Fan HY; Ma MC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):889-901. PubMed ID: 16279349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A permutation two one-sided tests procedure to detect minimal fold changes of gene expression levels.
    Liu JP; Liao CT; Chiu ST; Dai JY
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(5):808-26. PubMed ID: 18781518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the assessment of dose proportionality: a comparison of two slope approaches.
    Cheng B; Chow SC; Su WL
    J Biopharm Stat; 2006 May; 16(3):385-92. PubMed ID: 16724492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing assay linearity over a pre-specified range.
    Yang H; Novick SJ; LeBlond D
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(2):339-50. PubMed ID: 25356663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trimmed weighted Simes' test for two one-sided hypotheses with arbitrarily correlated test statistics.
    Brannath W; Bretz F; Maurer W; Sarkar S
    Biom J; 2009 Dec; 51(6):885-98. PubMed ID: 20014203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantile-function based null distribution in resampling based multiple testing.
    van der Laan MJ; Hubbard AE
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article14. PubMed ID: 17049025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Critical analysis of several analytical method validation strategies in the framework of the fit for purpose concept.
    Bouabidi A; Rozet E; Fillet M; Ziemons E; Chapuzet E; Mertens B; Klinkenberg R; Ceccato A; Talbi M; Streel B; Bouklouze A; Boulanger B; Hubert P
    J Chromatogr A; 2010 May; 1217(19):3180-92. PubMed ID: 19733857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A simulation study of cross-validation for selecting an optimal cutpoint in univariate survival analysis.
    Faraggi D; Simon R
    Stat Med; 1996 Oct; 15(20):2203-13. PubMed ID: 8910964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Alternative methods to evaluate trial level surrogacy.
    Abrahantes JC; Shkedy Z; Molenberghs G
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(3):194-208. PubMed ID: 18559408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a statistical equivalence test applied to microarray data.
    Qiu J; Cui X
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Mar; 20(2):240-66. PubMed ID: 20309757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A simple numerical approach towards improving the two one-sided test for average bioequivalence.
    Cao L; Mathew T
    Biom J; 2008 Apr; 50(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 18383447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Alternative statistical techniques to evaluate linearity.
    Tholen DW
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1992 Jul; 116(7):746-56. PubMed ID: 1497448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Precision and accuracy: concepts and assessment by method evaluation testing.
    Westgard JO
    Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci; 1981; 13(4):283-330. PubMed ID: 7016436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three p-value consistent procedures for multiple comparisons with a control in direction-mixed families.
    Kwong KS; Cheung SH; Holland B; Wang Y
    Stat Med; 2007 Oct; 26(23):4253-72. PubMed ID: 17342699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The assessment of non-inferiority in a gold standard design with censored, exponentially distributed endpoints.
    Mielke M; Munk A; Schacht A
    Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(25):5093-110. PubMed ID: 18570271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A method to increase the power of multiple testing procedures through sample splitting.
    Rubin D; Dudoit S; van der Laan M
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article19. PubMed ID: 17049030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.