BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18608144)

  • 1. The effect of context priming and task type on augmentative communication performance.
    Higginbotham DJ; Bisantz AM; Sunm M; Adams K; Yik F
    Augment Altern Commun; 2009 Mar; 25(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 18608144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Metrics for comparing three word-based software programs used for augmentative and alternative communication.
    Ratcliff A; Sutton BA; Lehman M
    Augment Altern Commun; 2009; 25(3):176-86. PubMed ID: 19544104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perspectives on AAC systems by the users and by their communication partners.
    McCall F; Marková I; Murphy J; Moodie E; Collins S
    Eur J Disord Commun; 1997; 32(3 Spec No):235-56. PubMed ID: 9474291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Strategies in construction and interpretation of graphic-symbol sequences by individuals who use AAC systems.
    Trudeau N; Sutton A; Morford JP; Côté-Giroux P; Pauzé AM; Vallée V
    Augment Altern Commun; 2010 Dec; 26(4):299-312. PubMed ID: 21091304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. "Communication is everything:" The experiences of volunteers who use AAC.
    Trembath D; Balandin S; Stancliffe RJ; Togher L
    Augment Altern Commun; 2010 Jun; 26(2):75-86. PubMed ID: 20497071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Functional communication in individuals with chronic severe aphasia using augmentative communication.
    Johnson RK; Hough MS; King KA; Vos P; Jeffs T
    Augment Altern Commun; 2008 Dec; 24(4):269-80. PubMed ID: 19023749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of the performance of 5-year-old children with typical development using iconic encoding in AAC systems with and without icon prediction on a fixed display.
    Drager KD; Light JC
    Augment Altern Commun; 2010 Mar; 26(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 20196700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The development and utilization of a scale to measure adolescents' attitudes toward peers who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices.
    Beck AR; Thompson JR; Kosuwan K; Prochnow JM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Jun; 53(3):572-87. PubMed ID: 20008679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vocabulary selection for Australian children who use augmentative and alternative communication.
    Trembath D; Balandin S; Togher L
    J Intellect Dev Disabil; 2007 Dec; 32(4):291-301. PubMed ID: 18049973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction and selection of vocabulary for two leisure activities.
    Dark L; Balandin S
    Augment Altern Commun; 2007; 23(4):288-99. PubMed ID: 17852052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving web access for individuals who rely on augmentative and alternative communication.
    Bryen DN; Heake G; Semenuk A; Segal M
    Augment Altern Commun; 2010 Mar; 26(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 20196701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vocabulary to support socially-valued adult roles.
    Bryen DN
    Augment Altern Commun; 2008 Dec; 24(4):294-301. PubMed ID: 19023751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Individuals with Intellectual disabilities and augmentative and alternative communication: Analysis of survey data on uptake of aided AAC, and loneliness experiences.
    Stancliffe RJ; Larson S; Auerbach K; Engler J; Taub S; Lakin KC
    Augment Altern Commun; 2010 Jun; 26(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 20497072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of three head-controlled mouse emulators in three light conditions.
    Fitzgerald MM; Sposato B; Politano P; Hetling J; O'Neill W
    Augment Altern Commun; 2009 Mar; 25(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 19280421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on the speech production of individuals with developmental disabilities: a research review.
    Millar DC; Light JC; Schlosser RW
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):248-64. PubMed ID: 16671842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of repeated listening experiences on the recognition of synthetic speech by individuals with severe intellectual disabilities.
    Koul R; Hester K
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Feb; 49(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 16533072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Teaching students with developmental disabilities to locate their AAC device.
    Sigafoos J; O'Reilly M; Seely-York S; Edrisinha C
    Res Dev Disabil; 2004; 25(4):371-83. PubMed ID: 15193671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptions of health care workers prescribing augmentative and alternative communication devices to children.
    Lindsay S
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2010 May; 5(3):209-22. PubMed ID: 20302418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An examination of preference for augmentative and alternative communication devices with two boys with significant intellectual disabilities.
    Cannella-Malone HI; DeBar RM; Sigafoos J
    Augment Altern Commun; 2009 Dec; 25(4):262-73. PubMed ID: 19883289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Augmentative and alternative communication use and acceptance by adults with traumatic brain injury.
    Fager S; Hux K; Beukelman DR; Karantounis R
    Augment Altern Commun; 2006 Mar; 22(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 17114157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.