These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

419 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18608317)

  • 21. Judgments of synchrony between auditory and moving or still visual stimuli.
    Fouriezos G; Capstick G; Monette F; Bellemare C; Parkinson M; Dumoulin A
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Dec; 61(4):277-92. PubMed ID: 18266504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Visual grouping by motion precedes the relative localization between moving and flashed stimuli.
    Watanabe K; Watanabe K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Jun; 30(3):504-12. PubMed ID: 15161382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Position perception: influence of motion with displacement dissociated from the influence of motion alone.
    Linares D; Holcombe AO
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Nov; 100(5):2472-6. PubMed ID: 18753324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Localizing the onset of moving stimuli by pointing or relative judgment: variations in the size of the Fröhlich effect.
    Müsseler J; Stork S; Kerzel D
    Vision Res; 2008 Feb; 48(4):611-7. PubMed ID: 18207214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The motion-induced position shift depends on the perceived direction of bistable quartet motion.
    Shim WM; Cavanagh P
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(20):2393-401. PubMed ID: 15246755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Motion signals bias localization judgments: a unified explanation for the flash-lag, flash-drag, flash-jump, and Frohlich illusions.
    Eagleman DM; Sejnowski TJ
    J Vis; 2007 Mar; 7(4):3. PubMed ID: 17461687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Flash-lag chimeras: the role of perceived alignment in the composite face effect.
    Khurana B; Carter RM; Watanabe K; Nijhawan R
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2757-72. PubMed ID: 16545419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Object updating and the flash-lag effect.
    Moore CM; Enns JT
    Psychol Sci; 2004 Dec; 15(12):866-71. PubMed ID: 15563333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evidence for an attentional component of the perceptual misalignment between moving and flashing stimuli.
    Baldo MV; Kihara AH; Namba J; Klein SA
    Perception; 2002; 31(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 11971260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Manual control of the visual stimulus reduces the flash-lag effect.
    Ichikawa M; Masakura Y
    Vision Res; 2006 Jul; 46(14):2192-203. PubMed ID: 16494918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bi-directional illusory position shifts toward the end point of apparent motion.
    Shim WM; Cavanagh P
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(19):3214-22. PubMed ID: 16774774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Spatial facilitation is involved in flash-lag effect.
    Maiche A; Budelli R; Gómez-Sena L
    Vision Res; 2007 Jun; 47(12):1655-61. PubMed ID: 17445857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Perceived timing of new objects and feature changes.
    Kanai R; Carlson TA; Verstraten FA; Walsh V
    J Vis; 2009 Jul; 9(7):5. PubMed ID: 19761320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cyclopean flash-lag illusion.
    Nieman D; Nijhawan R; Khurana B; Shimojo S
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(22):3909-14. PubMed ID: 16854446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Illusory position shift induced by plaid motion.
    Hisakata R; Murakami I
    Vision Res; 2009 Dec; 49(24):2902-10. PubMed ID: 19765606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Behavioral significance of motion direction causes anisotropic flash-lag, flash-drag, flash-repulsion, and movement-mislocalization effects.
    Shi Z; Nijhawan R
    J Vis; 2008 Aug; 8(7):24.1-14. PubMed ID: 19146257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Attentive tracking shifts the perceived location of a nearby flash.
    Shim WM; Cavanagh P
    Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(25-26):3253-61. PubMed ID: 16039690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The flash-lag effect as a spatiotemporal correlation structure.
    Murakami I
    J Vis; 2001; 1(2):126-36. PubMed ID: 12678607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Measuring attention using flash-lag effect.
    Shioiri S; Yamamoto K; Oshida H; Matsubara K; Yaguchi H
    J Vis; 2010 Aug; 10(10):10. PubMed ID: 20884475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Directional shifts in the barber pole illusion: effects of spatial frequency, spatial adaptation, and lateral masking.
    Lalanne C; Lorenceau J
    Vis Neurosci; 2006; 23(5):729-39. PubMed ID: 17020629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.