These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
43. The role of attention in motion extrapolation: are moving objects 'corrected' or flashed objects attentionally delayed? Khurana B; Watanabe K; Nijhawan R Perception; 2000; 29(6):675-92. PubMed ID: 11040951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Dynamic distortion of visual position representation around moving objects. Watanabe K; Yokoi K J Vis; 2008 Mar; 8(3):13.1-11. PubMed ID: 18484819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Neural latencies do not explain the auditory and audio-visual flash-lag effect. Arrighi R; Alais D; Burr D Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(23):2917-25. PubMed ID: 16115662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Illusory spatial offset of a flash relative to a moving stimulus is caused by differential latencies for moving and flashed stimuli. Whitney D; Murakami I; Cavanagh P Vision Res; 2000; 40(2):137-49. PubMed ID: 10793892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Simple differential latencies modulate, but do not cause the flash-lag effect. Arnold DH; Ong Y; Roseboom W J Vis; 2009 May; 9(5):4.1-8. PubMed ID: 19757882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Computational analyses for illusory transformations in the optic flow field and heading perception in the presence of moving objects. Hanada M Vision Res; 2005 Mar; 45(6):749-58. PubMed ID: 15639501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Visual contributions to human self-motion perception during horizontal body rotation. Mergner T; Schweigart G; Müller M; Hlavacka F; Becker W Arch Ital Biol; 2000 Apr; 138(2):139-66. PubMed ID: 10782255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Deciding what to see: the role of intention and attention in the perception of apparent motion. Kohler A; Haddad L; Singer W; Muckli L Vision Res; 2008 Mar; 48(8):1096-106. PubMed ID: 18279907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Perceptual compression of space through position integration. Roulston BW; Self MW; Zeki S Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Oct; 273(1600):2507-12. PubMed ID: 16959642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. An illusory transformation of optic flow fields without local motion interactions. Duijnhouwer J; Beintema JA; van den Berg AV; van Wezel RJ Vision Res; 2006 Feb; 46(4):439-43. PubMed ID: 16009393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Flash-lag effect: complicating motion extrapolation of the moving reference-stimulus paradoxically augments the effect. Bachmann T; Murd C; Põder E Psychol Res; 2012 Sep; 76(5):654-66. PubMed ID: 21818621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Object motion continuity and the flash-lag effect. Au RK; Watanabe K Vision Res; 2013 Nov; 92():19-25. PubMed ID: 23994485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. 3D flash lag illusion. Ishii M; Seekkuarachchi H; Tamura H; Tang Z Vision Res; 2004; 44(17):1981-4. PubMed ID: 15149831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The flash-lag effect during illusory chopstick rotation. Anstis S Perception; 2007; 36(7):1043-8. PubMed ID: 17844969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Motion and position coding. Arnold DH; Thompson M; Johnston A Vision Res; 2007 Aug; 47(18):2403-10. PubMed ID: 17643464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Floating square illusion: perceptual uncoupling of static and dynamic objects in motion. Carlson TA; Schrater P; He S J Vis; 2006 Feb; 6(2):132-44. PubMed ID: 16522140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]