178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18608338)
1. A patient-specific finite element methodology to predict damage accumulation in vertebral bodies under axial compression, sagittal flexion and combined loads.
Chevalier Y; Charlebois M; Pahr D; Varga P; Heini P; Schneider E; Zysset P
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2008 Oct; 11(5):477-87. PubMed ID: 18608338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relative strength of thoracic vertebrae in axial compression versus flexion.
Buckley JM; Kuo CC; Cheng LC; Loo K; Motherway J; Slyfield C; Deviren V; Ames C
Spine J; 2009 Jun; 9(6):478-85. PubMed ID: 19364678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Finite element analyses of human vertebral bodies embedded in polymethylmethalcrylate or loaded via the hyperelastic intervertebral disc models provide equivalent predictions of experimental strength.
Lu Y; Maquer G; Museyko O; Püschel K; Engelke K; Zysset P; Morlock M; Huber G
J Biomech; 2014 Jul; 47(10):2512-6. PubMed ID: 24818795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A patient-specific computer tomography-based finite element methodology to calculate the six dimensional stiffness matrix of human vertebral bodies.
Chevalier Y; Zysset PK
J Biomech Eng; 2012 May; 134(5):051006. PubMed ID: 22757494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of vertebral strength under loading conditions occurring in activities of daily living using a computed tomography-based nonlinear finite element method.
Matsumoto T; Ohnishi I; Bessho M; Imai K; Ohashi S; Nakamura K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jun; 34(14):1464-9. PubMed ID: 19525837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Finite element modeling of the human thoracolumbar spine.
Liebschner MA; Kopperdahl DL; Rosenberg WS; Keaveny TM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Mar; 28(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 12642762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. HR-pQCT-based homogenised finite element models provide quantitative predictions of experimental vertebral body stiffness and strength with the same accuracy as μFE models.
Pahr DH; Dall'Ara E; Varga P; Zysset PK
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2012; 15(7):711-20. PubMed ID: 21480081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of quantitative computed tomography-based measures in predicting vertebral compressive strength.
Buckley JM; Loo K; Motherway J
Bone; 2007 Mar; 40(3):767-74. PubMed ID: 17174619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Experimental validation of finite element analysis of human vertebral collapse under large compressive strains.
Hosseini HS; Clouthier AL; Zysset PK
J Biomech Eng; 2014 Apr; 136(4):. PubMed ID: 24384581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cement distribution, volume, and compliance in vertebroplasty: some answers from an anatomy-based nonlinear finite element study.
Chevalier Y; Pahr D; Charlebois M; Heini P; Schneider E; Zysset P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(16):1722-30. PubMed ID: 18628704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mechanical testing and biomechanical CT analysis to assess vertebral flexion strength of Chinese cadavers.
Feng W; Wei Y; Song F; Li Z; Fu R; Din RU; Li J; Liu W; Liu Y; Yang H
Med Eng Phys; 2022 Oct; 108():103882. PubMed ID: 36195367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Investigation of the failure behaviour of vertebral trabecular architectures under uni-axial compression and wedge action loading conditions.
McDonnell P; Harrison N; McHugh PE
Med Eng Phys; 2010 Jul; 32(6):569-76. PubMed ID: 20233666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative, 3D Visualization of the Initiation and Progression of Vertebral Fractures Under Compression and Anterior Flexion.
Jackman TM; Hussein AI; Curtiss C; Fein PM; Camp A; De Barros L; Morgan EF
J Bone Miner Res; 2016 Apr; 31(4):777-88. PubMed ID: 26590372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative computed tomography-based predictions of vertebral strength in anterior bending.
Buckley JM; Cheng L; Loo K; Slyfield C; Xu Z
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(9):1019-27. PubMed ID: 17450078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Finite element analysis predicts experimental failure patterns in vertebral bodies loaded via intervertebral discs up to large deformation.
Clouthier AL; Hosseini HS; Maquer G; Zysset PK
Med Eng Phys; 2015 Jun; 37(6):599-604. PubMed ID: 25922211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical versus pre-clinical FE models for vertebral body strength predictions.
Pahr DH; Schwiedrzik J; Dall'Ara E; Zysset PK
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 May; 33():76-83. PubMed ID: 23333770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Noninvasive prediction of vertebral body compressive strength using nonlinear finite element method and an image based technique.
Zeinali A; Hashemi B; Akhlaghpoor S
Phys Med; 2010 Apr; 26(2):88-97. PubMed ID: 19781969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative computed tomography-based finite element models of the human lumbar vertebral body: effect of element size on stiffness, damage, and fracture strength predictions.
Crawford RP; Rosenberg WS; Keaveny TM
J Biomech Eng; 2003 Aug; 125(4):434-8. PubMed ID: 12968567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Compressive strength of elderly vertebrae is reduced by disc degeneration and additional flexion.
Maquer G; Schwiedrzik J; Huber G; Morlock MM; Zysset PK
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Feb; 42():54-66. PubMed ID: 25460926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical changes after the augmentation of experimental osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in the cadaveric thoracic spine.
Kayanja MM; Togawa D; Lieberman IH
Spine J; 2005; 5(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 15653085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
