These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

351 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18608658)

  • 1. Impulsive responding and the sustained attention to response task.
    Helton WS
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2009 Jan; 31(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18608658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conscious thought and the sustained attention to response task.
    Helton WS; Kern RP; Walker DR
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Sep; 18(3):600-7. PubMed ID: 19589699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Global interference and spatial uncertainty in the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART).
    Helton WS; Weil L; Middlemiss A; Sawers A
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 20138552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
    Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sustained attention to local and global target features is different: performance and tympanic membrane temperature.
    Helton WS; Hayrynen L; Schaeffer D
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Oct; 71(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 19329239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhanced reactivity to visual stimuli in deaf individuals.
    Bottari D; Nava E; Ley P; Pavani F
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2010; 28(2):167-79. PubMed ID: 20404406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring sustained attention after traumatic brain injury: differences in key findings from the sustained attention to response task (SART).
    Whyte J; Grieb-Neff P; Gantz C; Polansky M
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(10):2007-14. PubMed ID: 16682059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fear-object perception: does it entail the involuntary capture of attention?
    Sebastiani L; Castellani E; Dalessandro L
    Arch Ital Biol; 2010 Mar; 148(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 20426252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Age differences in target detection and interference resolution in working memory: an event-related potential study.
    Tays WJ; Dywan J; Mathewson KJ; Segalowitz SJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 20(12):2250-62. PubMed ID: 18457511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selective impairment of masked priming in dual-task performance.
    Fischer R; Kiesel A; Kunde W; Schubert T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Mar; 64(3):572-95. PubMed ID: 20839135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Search asymmetry, sustained attention, and response inhibition.
    Stevenson H; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Nov; 77(2):215-22. PubMed ID: 21920656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automaticity of cognitive control: goal priming in response-inhibition paradigms.
    Verbruggen F; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1381-8. PubMed ID: 19686032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differential frontal activation during exogenous and endogenous orientation of visuospatial attention. A near-infrared spectroscopy study.
    Takahashi M; Ikegami M
    Neuropsychobiology; 2008; 58(2):55-64. PubMed ID: 18832860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The course of visual searching to a target in a fixed location: electrophysiological evidence from an emotional flanker task.
    Dong G; Yang L; Shen Y
    Neurosci Lett; 2009 Aug; 460(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 19446605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is the error-related negativity amplitude related to error detectability? Evidence from effects of different error types.
    Maier M; Steinhauser M; Hübner R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 20(12):2263-73. PubMed ID: 18457501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Processing multidimensional objects under different perceptual loads: the priority of bottom-up perceptual saliency.
    Wei P; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1114(1):113-24. PubMed ID: 16935270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bottom-up influences on voluntary task switching: the elusive homunculus escapes.
    Yeung N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):348-62. PubMed ID: 20192535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adaptive control of response preparedness in task switching.
    Steinhauser M; Hübner R; Druey M
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jul; 47(8-9):1826-35. PubMed ID: 19428414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Target predictability, sustained attention, and response inhibition.
    Carter L; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Brain Cogn; 2013 Jun; 82(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 23501702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attentional control of task and response in lateral and medial frontal cortex: brain activity and reaction time distributions.
    Aarts E; Roelofs A; van Turennout M
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Aug; 47(10):2089-99. PubMed ID: 19467359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.