These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18609338)

  • 1. Clinical myths of forensic neuropsychology.
    Greiffenstein MF
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2009 Feb; 23(2):286-96. PubMed ID: 18609338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating constructs represented by symptom validity tests in forensic neuropsychological assessment of traumatic brain injury.
    Frederick RI; Bowden SC
    J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2009; 24(2):105-22. PubMed ID: 19333066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A motion to exclude and the 'fixed' versus 'flexible' battery in 'forensic' neuropsychology: challenges to the practice of clinical neuropsychology.
    Bigler ED
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2007 Jan; 22(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 17194563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ethical issues associated with the assessment of exaggeration, poor effort, and malingering.
    Iverson GL
    Appl Neuropsychol; 2006; 13(2):77-90. PubMed ID: 17009881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A survey of neuropsychologists' beliefs and practices with respect to the assessment of effort.
    Sharland MJ; Gfeller JD
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2007 Feb; 22(2):213-23. PubMed ID: 17284353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity indicators within the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: application of new and previously researched multivariate procedures in multiple traumatic brain injury samples.
    King JH; Sweet JJ; Sherer M; Curtiss G; Vanderploeg RD
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2002 Dec; 16(4):506-23. PubMed ID: 12822059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Consensus Conference Statement on the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering.
    Heilbronner RL; Sweet JJ; Morgan JE; Larrabee GJ; Millis SR;
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2009 Sep; 23(7):1093-129. PubMed ID: 19735055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Official position of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology on serial neuropsychological assessments: the utility and challenges of repeat test administrations in clinical and forensic contexts.
    Heilbronner RL; Sweet JJ; Attix DK; Krull KR; Henry GK; Hart RP
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2010 Nov; 24(8):1267-78. PubMed ID: 21108148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Malingering assessment: evaluation of validity of performance.
    Vanderploeg RD; Curtiss G
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 11790911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Traumatic brain injury and forensic neuropsychology.
    Bigler ED; Brooks M
    J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2009; 24(2):76-87. PubMed ID: 19333063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Best practice guidelines for forensic neuropsychological examinations of patients with traumatic brain injury.
    Ruff R
    J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2009; 24(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 19333068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The investigation of event-related brain potentials in malingered neurocognitive deficit].
    Guo L; Cheng ZH; Liu XM
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Oct; 26(5):364-6, 373. PubMed ID: 21287742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Critiquing symptom validity tests for posttraumatic stress disorder: a modification of Hartman's criteria.
    Morel KR; Marshman KC
    J Anxiety Disord; 2008 Dec; 22(8):1542-50. PubMed ID: 18423958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Post-Daubert admissibility of scientific evidence on malingering of cognitive deficits.
    Vallabhajosula B; van Gorp WG
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2001; 29(2):207-15. PubMed ID: 11471788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The malingering factor.
    Williams JM
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2011 Apr; 26(3):280-5. PubMed ID: 21345930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distinguishing between neuropsychological malingering and exaggerated psychiatric symptoms in a neuropsychological setting.
    Ruocco AC; Swirsky-Sacchetti T; Chute DL; Mandel S; Platek SM; Zillmer EA
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2008 May; 22(3):547-64. PubMed ID: 17853126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Base rates of malingering and symptom exaggeration.
    Mittenberg W; Patton C; Canyock EM; Condit DC
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2002 Dec; 24(8):1094-102. PubMed ID: 12650234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The vulnerability to coaching across measures of effort.
    Brennan AM; Meyer S; David E; Pella R; Hill BD; Gouvier WD
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2009 Feb; 23(2):314-28. PubMed ID: 18609324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Commentary on "A motion to exclude and the 'fixed' versus 'flexible' battery in 'forensic' neuropsychology".
    Russell EW
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2007 Aug; 22(6):787-90. PubMed ID: 17630247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How'd they do it? Malingering strategies on symptom validity tests.
    Tan JE; Slick DJ; Strauss E; Hultsch DF
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2002 Dec; 16(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 12822058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.