371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18609381)
1. The eyes or the mouth? Feature salience and unfamiliar face processing in Williams syndrome and autism.
Riby DM; Doherty-Sneddon G; Bruce V
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jan; 62(1):189-203. PubMed ID: 18609381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can individuals with Williams syndrome interpret mental states from moving faces?
Riby DM; Back E
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):1914-22. PubMed ID: 20227428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Featural versus configural face processing in a rare genetic disorder: Williams syndrome.
Isaac L; Lincoln A
J Intellect Disabil Res; 2011 Nov; 55(11):1034-42. PubMed ID: 21554469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differences in discrimination of eye and mouth displacement in autism spectrum disorders.
Rutherford MD; Clements KA; Sekuler AB
Vision Res; 2007 Jul; 47(15):2099-110. PubMed ID: 17559905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Physiological reactivity to faces via live and video-mediated communication in typical and atypical development.
Riby DM; Whittle L; Doherty-Sneddon G
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2012; 34(4):385-95. PubMed ID: 22260255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Exploration of core features of a human face by healthy and autistic adults analyzed by visual scanning.
Hernandez N; Metzger A; Magné R; Bonnet-Brilhault F; Roux S; Barthelemy C; Martineau J
Neuropsychologia; 2009 Mar; 47(4):1004-12. PubMed ID: 19027761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Atypical unfamiliar face processing in Williams syndrome: what can it tell us about typical familiarity effects?
Riby DM; Doherty-Sneddon G; Bruce V
Cogn Neuropsychiatry; 2008 Jan; 13(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 18092225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does face inversion qualitatively change face processing: an eye movement study using a face change detection task.
Xu B; Tanaka JW
J Vis; 2013 Feb; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 23420421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Face identity recognition in autism spectrum disorders: a review of behavioral studies.
Weigelt S; Koldewyn K; Kanwisher N
Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2012 Mar; 36(3):1060-84. PubMed ID: 22212588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Categorical perception effects for facial identity in robustly represented familiar and self-faces: the role of configural and featural information.
Keyes H
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):760-72. PubMed ID: 22248095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Configural and local processing of faces in children with Williams syndrome.
Deruelle C; Mancini J; Livet MO; Cassé-Perrot C; de Schonen S
Brain Cogn; 1999 Dec; 41(3):276-98. PubMed ID: 10585239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do children with autism perceive second-order relational features? The case of the Thatcher illusion.
Rouse H; Donnelly N; Hadwin JA; Brown T
J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2004 Oct; 45(7):1246-57. PubMed ID: 15335345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigations of face expertise in the social developmental disorders.
Barton JJ; Hefter RL; Cherkasova MV; Manoach DS
Neurology; 2007 Aug; 69(9):860-70. PubMed ID: 17724288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Recognition of emotional and nonemotional facial expressions: a comparison between Williams syndrome and autism.
Lacroix A; Guidetti M; Rogé B; Reilly J
Res Dev Disabil; 2009; 30(5):976-85. PubMed ID: 19286347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Attention to internal face features in unfamiliar face matching.
Fletcher KI; Butavicius MA; Lee MD
Br J Psychol; 2008 Aug; 99(Pt 3):379-94. PubMed ID: 17706001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does prosopagnosia take the eyes out of face representations? Evidence for a defect in representing diagnostic facial information following brain damage.
Caldara R; Schyns P; Mayer E; Smith ML; Gosselin F; Rossion B
J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Oct; 17(10):1652-66. PubMed ID: 16269103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Looking and thinking: how individuals with Williams syndrome make judgements about mental states.
Hanley M; Riby DM; Caswell S; Rooney S; Back E
Res Dev Disabil; 2013 Dec; 34(12):4466-76. PubMed ID: 24139712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are representations of unfamiliar faces independent of encoding modality?
Casey SJ; Newell FN
Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):506-13. PubMed ID: 16597451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Social relevance boosts context processing in Williams syndrome.
Santos A; Rondan C; Milne D; Démonet JF; Deruelle C
Dev Neuropsychol; 2008; 33(4):553-64. PubMed ID: 18568904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perceptual separability of featural and configural information in congenital prosopagnosia.
Kimchi R; Behrmann M; Avidan G; Amishav R
Cogn Neuropsychol; 2012; 29(5-6):447-63. PubMed ID: 23428081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
