BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18609404)

  • 1. Information structure expectations in sentence comprehension.
    Carlson K; Dickey MW; Frazier L; Clifton C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jan; 62(1):114-39. PubMed ID: 18609404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pitch accents create dissociable syntactic and semantic expectations during sentence processing.
    van der Burght CL; Friederici AD; Goucha T; Hartwigsen G
    Cognition; 2021 Jul; 212():104702. PubMed ID: 33857845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Phonological markers of information structure: an fMRI study.
    van Leeuwen TM; Lamers MJ; Petersson KM; Gussenhoven C; Rietveld T; Poser B; Hagoort P
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 May; 58():64-74. PubMed ID: 24726334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prosodic phrasing is central to language comprehension.
    Frazier L; Carlson K; Clifton C
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2006 Jun; 10(6):244-9. PubMed ID: 16651019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of prosodic breaks and pitch accents in grouping words during on-line sentence processing.
    Bögels S; Schriefers H; Vonk W; Chwilla DJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 23(9):2447-67. PubMed ID: 20961171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Information Structure Preferences in Focus-Sensitive Ellipsis: How Defaults Persist.
    Harris JA; Carlson K
    Lang Speech; 2018 Sep; 61(3):480-512. PubMed ID: 29119869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When prosody fails to cue syntactic structure: 9-month-olds' sensitivity to phonological versus syntactic phrases.
    Gerken L; Jusczyk PW; Mandel DR
    Cognition; 1994 Mar; 51(3):237-65. PubMed ID: 8194302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Components of speech prosody and their use in detection of syntactic structure by older adults.
    Hoyte KJ; Brownell H; Wingfield A
    Exp Aging Res; 2009; 35(1):129-51. PubMed ID: 19173106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Semantic integration processes at different levels of syntactic hierarchy during sentence comprehension: an ERP study.
    Zhou X; Jiang X; Ye Z; Zhang Y; Lou K; Zhan W
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 May; 48(6):1551-62. PubMed ID: 20138898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Imagery in sentence comprehension: an fMRI study.
    Just MA; Newman SD; Keller TA; McEleney A; Carpenter PA
    Neuroimage; 2004 Jan; 21(1):112-24. PubMed ID: 14741648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Focus and VP ellipsis.
    Frazier L; Clifton C; Carlson K
    Lang Speech; 2007; 50(Pt 1):1-21. PubMed ID: 17518101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of prosodic boundaries on comprehension of spoken English sentences.
    Blasko DG; Hall MD
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Aug; 87(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 9760620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An fMRI study of canonical and noncanonical word order in German.
    Bahlmann J; Rodriguez-Fornells A; Rotte M; Münte TF
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2007 Oct; 28(10):940-9. PubMed ID: 17274018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Focus, accent, and argument structure: effects on language comprehension.
    Birch S; Clifton C
    Lang Speech; 1995; 38 ( Pt 4)():365-91. PubMed ID: 8816086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of sentential position on noun phrase structure priming.
    Melinger A; Cleland AA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Nov; 64(11):2211-35. PubMed ID: 21736436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Syntactic priming in German-English bilinguals during sentence comprehension.
    Weber K; Indefrey P
    Neuroimage; 2009 Jul; 46(4):1164-72. PubMed ID: 19328233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enhancement and suppression effects resulting from information structuring in sentences.
    Sanford AJ; Price J; Sanford AJ
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Sep; 37(6):880-8. PubMed ID: 19679866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accents, focus distribution, and the perceived distribution of given and new information: An experiment.
    Nooteboom SG; Kruyt JG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Nov; 82(5):1512-24. PubMed ID: 3693693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prosodic influences on the resolution of temporary ambiguity during on-line sentence processing.
    Nagel HN; Shapiro LP; Tuller B; Nawy R
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1996 Mar; 25(2):319-44. PubMed ID: 8667301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.