These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1860983)

  • 1. Animal model evaluations for Mexican Holsteins.
    Powell RL; Wiggans GR
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Apr; 74(4):1420-7. PubMed ID: 1860983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interaction between milk yield of Holstein cows in Mexico and the United States.
    Cienfuegos-Rivas EG; Oltenacu PA; Blake RW; Schwager SJ; Castillo-Juarez H; Ruiz FJ
    J Dairy Sci; 1999 Oct; 82(10):2218-23. PubMed ID: 10531610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of genetic evaluations from animal model and modified contemporary comparison.
    Norman HD; Powell RL; Wiggans GR
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Jul; 74(7):2309-16. PubMed ID: 1894820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of international dairy sire evaluations from meta-analysis of national estimated breeding values and direct analysis of individual animal performance records.
    Maltecca C; Bagnato A; Weigel KA
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Aug; 87(8):2599-605. PubMed ID: 15328284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fertility responses of Mexican Holstein cows to US sire selection.
    Cienfuegos-Rivas EG; Blake RW; Oltenacu PA; Castillo-Juarez H
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 Jul; 89(7):2755-60. PubMed ID: 16772595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetic evaluation of dairy cattle with test-day models with autoregressive covariance structures and with a 305-d model.
    Sawalha RM; Keown JF; Kachman SD; Van Vleck LD
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Sep; 88(9):3346-53. PubMed ID: 16107425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selection response for milk production in conventional production systems in Mexico, using genetic evaluations of Holstein sires from Canada and the United States.
    Montaldo HH; Núñez-Soto SG; Ruiz-López FJ; Castillo-Juárez H
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5270-5. PubMed ID: 19762845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genotype x environment interaction for grazing versus confinement. I. Production traits.
    Kearney JF; Schutz MM; Boettcher PJ; Weigel KA
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Feb; 87(2):501-9. PubMed ID: 14762093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Within-herd heritability estimated with daughter-parent regression for yield and somatic cell score.
    Dechow CD; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Jan; 90(1):482-92. PubMed ID: 17183117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of maturity rate of daughters on genetic ranking of Holstein bulls.
    Norman HD; Wright JR; Powell RL; Vanraden PM
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Sep; 88(9):3337-45. PubMed ID: 16107424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Environmental sensitivity for milk yield in Luxembourg and Tunisian Holsteins by herd management level.
    Hammami H; Rekik B; Bastin C; Soyeurt H; Bormann J; Stoll J; Gengler N
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Sep; 92(9):4604-12. PubMed ID: 19700723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Heritability of changes in genetic evaluations of dairy bulls from first to later records of daughters.
    Abdallah JM; McDaniel BT
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Apr; 85(4):951-7. PubMed ID: 12018441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Short communication: Genetic evaluation of milking speed for Brown Swiss dairy cattle in the United States.
    Wiggans GR; Thornton LL; Neitzel RR; Gengler N
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Feb; 90(2):1021-3. PubMed ID: 17235180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of longevity breeding values for US Holstein sires using survival analysis methodology.
    Caraviello DZ; Weigel KA; Gianola D
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Oct; 87(10):3518-25. PubMed ID: 15377631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic evaluation of bulls and cows with single- and multiple-country test-day models.
    Jamrozik J; Schaeffer LR; Weigel KA
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Jun; 85(6):1617-22. PubMed ID: 12146495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic evaluation of lactation persistency for five breeds of dairy cattle.
    Cole JB; Null DJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 May; 92(5):2248-58. PubMed ID: 19389984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic evaluations for mixed-breed populations.
    VanRaden PM; Tooker ME; Cole JB; Wiggans GR; Megonigal JH
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 May; 90(5):2434-41. PubMed ID: 17430948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Body condition scores and dairy form evaluations as indicators of days open in US Holsteins.
    Dechow CD; Rogers GW; Klei L; Lawlor TJ; VanRaden PM
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Oct; 87(10):3534-41. PubMed ID: 15377633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of predicting genetic merit from pedigree information for bulls entering stud sampling programs.
    Samuelson DJ; Pearson RE
    J Dairy Sci; 1995 Sep; 78(9):2057-66. PubMed ID: 8550915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of bovine somatotropin on genetic evaluation of dairy sires and cows.
    Weigel KA; Fisher TM; Van der Linde C; Gianola D; Rekaya R
    J Dairy Sci; 1998 Jul; 81(7):2045-51. PubMed ID: 9710775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.