These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1861002)

  • 1. Differential sensitivity to vowel continua in Old World monkeys (Macaca) and humans.
    Sinnott JM; Kreiter NA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 May; 89(5):2421-9. PubMed ID: 1861002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Macaque thresholds for detecting increases in intensity: effects of formant structure.
    Le Prell CG; Niemiec AJ; Moody DB
    Hear Res; 2001 Dec; 162(1-2):29-42. PubMed ID: 11707349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Formant frequency discrimination by Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata).
    Sommers MS; Moody DB; Prosen CA; Stebbins WC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3499-510. PubMed ID: 1619126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection and discrimination of synthetic English vowels by Old World monkeys (Cercopithecus, Macaca) and humans.
    Sinnott JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Aug; 86(2):557-65. PubMed ID: 2768672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A multidimensional scaling analysis of vowel discrimination in humans and monkeys.
    Sinnott JM; Brown CH; Malik WT; Kressley RA
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Nov; 59(8):1214-24. PubMed ID: 9401456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frequency and intensity discrimination in humans and monkeys.
    Sinnott JM; Petersen MR; Hopp SL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Dec; 78(6):1977-85. PubMed ID: 4078174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differential sensitivity of Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata) and humans (Homo sapiens) to peak position along a synthetic coo call continuum.
    Hopp SL; Sinnott JM; Owren MJ; Petersen MR
    J Comp Psychol; 1992 Jun; 106(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 1600720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The intensity-difference limen for Gaussian-enveloped stimuli as a function of level: tones and broadband noise.
    Nizami L; Reimer JF; Jesteadt W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2505-15. PubMed ID: 11757940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Formant-frequency discrimination for isolated English vowels.
    Kewley-Port D; Watson CS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jan; 95(1):485-96. PubMed ID: 8120259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Formant-frequency discrimination of synthesized vowels in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and humans.
    Henry KS; Amburgey KN; Abrams KS; Idrobo F; Carney LH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Oct; 142(4):2073. PubMed ID: 29092534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory duration discrimination in Old World monkeys (Macaca, Cercopithecus) and humans.
    Sinnott JM; Owren MJ; Petersen MR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Aug; 82(2):465-70. PubMed ID: 3624651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Discrimination of frequency transitions by human infants.
    Aslin RN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Aug; 86(2):582-90. PubMed ID: 2768673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Second-order modulation detection thresholds for pure-tone and narrow-band noise carriers.
    Lorenzi C; Simpson MI; Millman RE; Griffiths TD; Woods WP; Rees A; Green GG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2470-8. PubMed ID: 11757936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of varying signal and noise levels on pure-tone frequency discrimination in humans and monkeys.
    Sinnott JM; Brown CH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Mar; 93(3):1535-40. PubMed ID: 8473606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Frequency and intensity discrimination in Mongolian gerbils, African monkeys and humans.
    Sinnott JM; Brown CH; Brown FE
    Hear Res; 1992 May; 59(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 1618711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fundamental frequency effects on thresholds for vowel formant discrimination.
    Kewley-Port D; Li X; Zheng Y; Neel AT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Oct; 100(4 Pt 1):2462-70. PubMed ID: 8865651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Difference limens for formant patterns of vowel sounds.
    Hawks JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Feb; 95(2):1074-84. PubMed ID: 8132901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vowel discrimination in cats: thresholds for the detection of second formant changes in the vowel /epsilon/.
    Hienz RD; Aleszczyk CM; May BJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Aug; 100(2 Pt 1):1052-8. PubMed ID: 8759958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vowel formant discrimination II: Effects of stimulus uncertainty, consonantal context, and training.
    Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2141-55. PubMed ID: 11681391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling formant frequency discrimination of female vowels.
    Sommers MS; Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jun; 99(6):3770-81. PubMed ID: 8655808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.