These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1861011)

  • 1. How finishing affects glass ionomers. Results of a five-year evaluation.
    Matis BA; Carlson T; Cochran M; Phillips RW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1991 Jul; 122(7):43-6. PubMed ID: 1861011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microleakage of glass ionomer cement and composite resin restorations in cut non-retentive preparations and pre-existing cervical erosion/abrasion lesions.
    Kaplan I; Harris EF; Mincer HH; Gilpatrick RO
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1993 Apr; 73(2):24-8. PubMed ID: 8309244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Longevity of glass-ionomer restorative materials: results of a 10-year evaluation.
    Matis BA; Cochran M; Carlson T
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Jun; 27(6):373-82. PubMed ID: 8941830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations.
    Powell LV; Johnson GH; Gordon GE
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8700767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of direct esthetic restorations in cervical abrasion/erosion lesions: one-year results.
    Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Sep; 22(9):687-92. PubMed ID: 1835107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical comparison of Class V resin composite and glass ionomer restorations.
    Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH
    Am J Dent; 1992 Oct; 5(5):249-52. PubMed ID: 1299249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensitivity restored of Class V abrasion/erosion lesions.
    Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1990 Dec; 121(6):694-6. PubMed ID: 2148943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Glass ionomers in the restoration of root surface caries, Class 5 caries and Class 5 erosion/abrasion lesions.
    Marshall TD
    Tex Dent J; 1990 Mar; 107(3):23-8. PubMed ID: 2368016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative analysis of techniques of restoring cervical lesions.
    Sidhu SK
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Aug; 24(8):553-9. PubMed ID: 8272493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.
    Ermiş RB
    Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Glass ionomer restoratives.
    Berry EA
    J Indiana Dent Assoc; 1993; 72(5):25-7. PubMed ID: 8040719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of five adhesive systems.
    Tyas MJ
    Am J Dent; 1994 Apr; 7(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 8054189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of esthetic parameters of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials and a polyacid-modified resin composite in Class V cervical lesions.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Sep; 30(9):607-14. PubMed ID: 10765866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of cavity pretreatment procedures on dentin bonding: a four-year clinical evaluation.
    van Dijken JW
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Aug; 64(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 2202813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Restoration of cervical erosions and abrasions].
    Kakamboura A
    Odontostomatol Proodos; 1986 Jun; 40(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 3095749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conservative management of erosion-abrasion.
    Bevenius J
    Aust Dent J; 1994 Aug; 39(4):268. PubMed ID: 7945058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-year evaluation of effect of surface conditioning on bonding of glass ionomer cement in cervical abrasion lesions.
    van Dijken J
    Scand J Dent Res; 1992 Apr; 100(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 1574680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two-year clinical performance of Class V resin-modified glass-lonomer and resin composite restorations.
    Brackett WW; Dib A; Brackett MG; Reyes AA; Estrada BE
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):477-81. PubMed ID: 14531590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Restoring Class V lesions Part 2: Abfraction lesions.
    Miller MB
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1997; 9(5):505-6. PubMed ID: 9550076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 1-year clinical evaluation of Compoglass and Fuji II LC in cervical erosion/abfraction lesions.
    Brackett WW; Browning WD; Ross JA; Gregory PN; Owens BM
    Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):119-22. PubMed ID: 10649933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.