These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18612577)

  • 1. Accuracy of photographs to capture respondent-defined drink size.
    Kaskutas LA; Kerr WC
    J Stud Alcohol Drugs; 2008 Jul; 69(4):605-10. PubMed ID: 18612577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A drink is a drink? Variation in the amount of alcohol contained in beer, wine and spirits drinks in a US methodological sample.
    Kerr WC; Greenfield TK; Tujague J; Brown SE
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2005 Nov; 29(11):2015-21. PubMed ID: 16340459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. "My drink is larger than yours"? A literature review of self-defined drink sizes and standard drinks.
    Devos-Comby L; Lange JE
    Curr Drug Abuse Rev; 2008 Jun; 1(2):162-76. PubMed ID: 19630715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An alternative to standard drinks as a measure of alcohol consumption.
    Kaskutas LA; Graves K
    J Subst Abuse; 2000; 12(1-2):67-78. PubMed ID: 11288475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Actual and perceived units of alcohol in a self-defined "usual glass" of alcoholic drinks in England.
    Boniface S; Kneale J; Shelton N
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2013 Jun; 37(6):978-83. PubMed ID: 23278164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adjustments for drink size and ethanol content: new results from a self-report diary and transdermal sensor validation study.
    Bond JC; Greenfield TK; Patterson D; Kerr WC
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2014 Dec; 38(12):3060-7. PubMed ID: 25581661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The alcohol content of self-report and 'standard' drinks.
    Lemmens PH
    Addiction; 1994 May; 89(5):593-601. PubMed ID: 8044126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Large drinks are no mistake: glass size, not shape, affects alcoholic beverage drink pours.
    Kerr WC; Patterson D; Koenen MA; Greenfield TK
    Drug Alcohol Rev; 2009 Jul; 28(4):360-5. PubMed ID: 19594789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differences in the measured alcohol content of drinks between black, white and Hispanic men and women in a US national sample.
    Kerr WC; Patterson D; Greenfield TK
    Addiction; 2009 Sep; 104(9):1503-11. PubMed ID: 19438419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do college students drink more than they think? Use of a free-pour paradigm to determine how college students define standard drinks.
    White AM; Kraus CL; McCracken LA; Swartzwelder HS
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2003 Nov; 27(11):1750-6. PubMed ID: 14634490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Empirical evaluation of the presence of a label containing standard drinks on pour accuracy among US college students.
    Brunk E; Becker MW; Bix L
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0241583. PubMed ID: 33151959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Energy intake estimates of respondent-measured alcoholic beverages.
    Tujague J; Kerr WC
    Alcohol Alcohol; 2009; 44(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 18845529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Hispanic Americans baseline alcohol survey: alcoholic beverage preference across Hispanic national groups.
    Caetano R; Vaeth PA; Ramisetty-Mikler S; Rodriguez LA
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2009 Jan; 33(1):150-9. PubMed ID: 18976346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Volume of ethanol consumption: effects of different approaches to measurement.
    Dawson DA
    J Stud Alcohol; 1998 Mar; 59(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 9500306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Drinking and driving: explaining beverage-specific risks.
    Gruenewald PJ; Johnson FW; Millar A; Mitchell PR
    J Stud Alcohol; 2000 Jul; 61(4):515-23. PubMed ID: 10928721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of 'standard drink' labelling on the ability of drinkers to pour a 'standard drink'.
    Stockwell T; Blaze-Temple D; Walker C
    Aust J Public Health; 1991 Mar; 15(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 2025677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. College students lack knowledge of standard drink volumes: implications for definitions of risky drinking based on survey data.
    White AM; Kraus CL; Flom JD; Kestenbaum LA; Mitchell JR; Shah K; Swartzwelder HS
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2005 Apr; 29(4):631-8. PubMed ID: 15834229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What do binge drinkers drink? Implications for alcohol control policy.
    Naimi TS; Brewer RD; Miller JW; Okoro C; Mehrotra C
    Am J Prev Med; 2007 Sep; 33(3):188-93. PubMed ID: 17826577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of alcoholic standard drinks using the Munich composite international diagnostic interview (M-CIDI): An evaluation and subsequent revision.
    Kuitunen-Paul S; Rehm J; Lachenmeier DW; Kadrić F; Kuitunen PT; Wittchen HU; Manthey J
    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2017 Sep; 26(3):. PubMed ID: 28370786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Alcohol content variation of bar and restaurant drinks in Northern California.
    Kerr WC; Patterson D; Koenen MA; Greenfield TK
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2008 Sep; 32(9):1623-9. PubMed ID: 18616674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.