These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18613118)

  • 1. Multipoint lods provide reliable linkage evidence despite unknown limiting distribution: type I error probabilities decrease with sample size for multipoint lods and mods.
    Hodge SE; Rodriguez-Murillo L; Strug LJ; Greenberg DA
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Dec; 32(8):800-15. PubMed ID: 18613118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using parametric multipoint lods and mods for linkage analysis requires a shift in statistical thinking.
    Hodge SE; Baskurt Z; Strug LJ
    Hum Hered; 2011; 72(4):264-75. PubMed ID: 22189469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distribution and magnitude of type I error of model-based multipoint lod scores: implications for multipoint mod scores.
    Xing C; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Jul; 30(5):447-58. PubMed ID: 16685712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lods, wrods, and mods: the interpretation of lod scores calculated under different models.
    Hodge SE; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1994; 11(4):329-42. PubMed ID: 7813895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Magnitude of type I error when single-locus linkage analysis is maximized over models: a simulation study.
    Hodge SE; Abreu PC; Greenberg DA
    Am J Hum Genet; 1997 Jan; 60(1):217-27. PubMed ID: 8981965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantification of type I error probabilities for heterogeneity LOD scores.
    Abreu PC; Hodge SE; Greenberg DA
    Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Feb; 22(2):156-69. PubMed ID: 11788961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Linkage analysis in the presence of errors III: marker loci and their map as nuisance parameters.
    Göring HH; Terwilliger JD
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1298-309. PubMed ID: 10731467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Linkage disequilibrium inflates type I error rates in multipoint linkage analysis when parental genotypes are missing.
    Boyles AL; Scott WK; Martin ER; Schmidt S; Li YJ; Ashley-Koch A; Bass MP; Schmidt M; Pericak-Vance MA; Speer MC; Hauser ER
    Hum Hered; 2005; 59(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 16093727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An alternative foundation for the planning and evaluation of linkage analysis. I. Decoupling "error probabilities" from "measures of evidence".
    Strug LJ; Hodge SE
    Hum Hered; 2006; 61(3):166-88. PubMed ID: 16865000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distribution of model-based multipoint heterogeneity lod scores.
    Xing C; Morris N; Xing G
    Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Dec; 34(8):912-6. PubMed ID: 21104892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Model-free linkage analysis using likelihoods.
    Curtis D; Sham PC
    Am J Hum Genet; 1995 Sep; 57(3):703-16. PubMed ID: 7668300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Allele frequency misspecification: effect on power and Type I error of model-dependent linkage analysis of quantitative traits under random ascertainment.
    Mandal DM; Sorant AJ; Atwood LD; Wilson AF; Bailey-Wilson JE
    BMC Genet; 2006 Apr; 7():21. PubMed ID: 16618369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A multipoint method for detecting genotyping errors and mutations in sibling-pair linkage data.
    Douglas JA; Boehnke M; Lange K
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1287-97. PubMed ID: 10739757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robustness and power of the maximum-likelihood-binomial and maximum-likelihood-score methods, in multipoint linkage analysis of affected-sibship data.
    Abel L; Müller-Myhsok B
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Aug; 63(2):638-47. PubMed ID: 9683590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The score statistic of the LD-lod analysis: detecting linkage adaptive to linkage disequilibrium.
    Huang J; Jiang Y
    Hum Hered; 2001; 52(2):83-98. PubMed ID: 11474209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inferential testing for linkage with GENEHUNTER-MODSCORE: the impact of the pedigree structure on the null distribution of multipoint MOD scores.
    Mattheisen M; Dietter J; Knapp M; Baur MP; Strauch K
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 32(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 17849490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determining the sample size for co-dominant molecular marker-assisted linkage detection for a monogenic qualitative trait by controlling the type-I and type-II errors in a segregating F2 population.
    Hühn M; Piepho HP
    Theor Appl Genet; 2003 Mar; 106(5):840-5. PubMed ID: 12647058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determining trait locus position from multipoint analysis: accuracy and power of three different statistics.
    Greenberg DA; Abreu PC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Dec; 21(4):299-314. PubMed ID: 11754466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Construction of conditional lod tables from multiple-locus linkage data.
    MacLean CJ; Lew R; Yee S
    Genet Epidemiol; 1985; 2(4):375-86. PubMed ID: 4085788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of a multipoint identity-by-descent method with parametric multipoint linkage analysis for mapping quantitative traits.
    Goldgar DE; Oniki RS
    Am J Hum Genet; 1992 Mar; 50(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 1539596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.