These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18613638)

  • 21. Assessing the Role of the Left Dorsal Frontal Cortex in Working Memory Guidance: Attentional or Mnemonic? A Neurostimulation Study.
    Bourbon-Teles J; Soto D
    Neuroscience; 2019 Jul; 411():140-149. PubMed ID: 31103707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Different prioritization states of working memory representations affect visual searches: Evidence from an event-related potential study.
    Wang M; Liu H; Chen Y; Yang P; Fu S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2023 Nov; 193():112246. PubMed ID: 37739042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effects of search-irrelevant working memory content on visual search.
    Calleja MO; Willoughby AR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Feb; 85(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 36596986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Multiple representations in visual working memory simultaneously guide attention: The type of memory-matching representation matters.
    Fan L; Sun M; Xu M; Li Z; Diao L; Zhang X
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():126-137. PubMed ID: 30471521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory.
    Soto D; Heinke D; Humphreys GW; Blanco MJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Apr; 31(2):248-61. PubMed ID: 15826228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Working memory and target-related distractor effects on visual search.
    Balani AB; Soto D; Humphreys GW
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Dec; 38(8):1058-76. PubMed ID: 21156870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Automatic capture of attention by conceptually generated working memory templates.
    Sun SZ; Shen J; Shaw M; Cant JS; Ferber S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Aug; 77(6):1841-7. PubMed ID: 25944451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Attentional capture by working memory contents.
    Pan Y
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Jun; 64(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 20565178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Emotional influences on perception and working memory.
    Hur J; Iordan AD; Dolcos F; Berenbaum H
    Cogn Emot; 2017 Sep; 31(6):1294-1302. PubMed ID: 27685764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Long-term memory for distractors: Effects of involuntary attention from working memory.
    Moriya J
    Mem Cognit; 2024 Feb; 52(2):401-416. PubMed ID: 37768481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Working memory, perceptual priming, and the perception of hierarchical forms: opposite effects of priming and working memory without memory refreshing.
    Kim JI; Humphreys GW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1533-55. PubMed ID: 20675799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Rapid influences of cued visual memories on attentional guidance.
    van Moorselaar D; Battistoni E; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():1-10. PubMed ID: 25428708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Task-based working memory guidance of visual attention.
    Chen Z; Tsou BH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):1082-95. PubMed ID: 21264740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Measuring working memory load effects on electrophysiological markers of attention orienting during a simulated drive.
    Ross V; Vossen AY; Smulders FTY; Ruiter RAC; Brijs T; Brijs K; Wets G; Jongen EMM
    Ergonomics; 2018 Mar; 61(3):429-443. PubMed ID: 28689462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The relationship between working memory and the dual-target cost in visual search guidance.
    Menneer T; Cave KR; Kaplan E; Stroud MJ; Chang J; Donnelly N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Jul; 45(7):911-935. PubMed ID: 30985178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Working memory-driven attention towards a distractor does not interfere with target feature perception.
    Dowd EW; Nag S; Golomb JD
    Vis cogn; 2019; 27(9-10):714-731. PubMed ID: 33013176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impact of working memory load on cognitive control in trait anxiety: an ERP study.
    Qi S; Zeng Q; Luo Y; Duan H; Ding C; Hu W; Li H
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e111791. PubMed ID: 25369121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Maintaining rejected distractors in working memory during visual search depends on search stimuli: Evidence from contralateral delay activity.
    Williams LH; Drew T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):67-84. PubMed ID: 33000442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
    Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Planning sentences while doing other things at the same time: effects of concurrent verbal and visuospatial working memory load.
    Klaus J; Mädebach A; Oppermann F; Jescheniak JD
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Apr; 70(4):811-831. PubMed ID: 26985697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.