These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18613638)

  • 41. Cognitive-behavioral and electrophysiological evidence of the affective consequences of ignoring stimulus representations in working memory.
    De Vito D; Ferrey AE; Fenske MJ; Al-Aidroos N
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 18(3):460-475. PubMed ID: 29546688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Decoding working memory content from attentional biases.
    Dowd EW; Pearson JM; Egner T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1252-1260. PubMed ID: 28155212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effect of negative emotional content on attentional maintenance in working memory.
    Plancher G; Massol S; Dorel T; Chainay H
    Cogn Emot; 2019 Nov; 33(7):1489-1496. PubMed ID: 30584794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Electrophysiological evidence for enhanced representation of food stimuli in working memory.
    Rutters F; Kumar S; Higgs S; Humphreys GW
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 233(2):519-28. PubMed ID: 25354971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Rapid top-down control over template-guided attention shifts to multiple objects.
    Grubert A; Fahrenfort J; Olivers CNL; Eimer M
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 146():843-858. PubMed ID: 27554532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Guidance of visual attention from working memory contents depends on stimulus attributes.
    Zhang B; Zhang JX; Kong L; Huang S; Yue Z; Wang S
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Dec; 486(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 20884328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Memory under pressure: secondary-task effects on contextual cueing of visual search.
    Annac E; Manginelli AA; Pollmann S; Shi Z; Müller HJ; Geyer T
    J Vis; 2013 Nov; 13(13):6. PubMed ID: 24190911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Activity in human visual and parietal cortex reveals object-based attention in working memory.
    Peters B; Kaiser J; Rahm B; Bledowski C
    J Neurosci; 2015 Feb; 35(8):3360-9. PubMed ID: 25716836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Working memory modulates the anger superiority effect in central and peripheral visual fields.
    Li X; Lin Z; Chen Y; Gong M
    Cogn Emot; 2023 Mar; 37(2):271-283. PubMed ID: 36565287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The presence of a distractor matching the content of working memory induces delayed quitting in visual search.
    Wu Y; Pan Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Apr; 84(3):760-770. PubMed ID: 35359229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. No age deficits in the ability to use attention to improve visual working memory.
    Souza AS
    Psychol Aging; 2016 Aug; 31(5):456-70. PubMed ID: 27253868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Foraging through multiple target categories reveals the flexibility of visual working memory.
    Kristjánsson T; Kristjánsson Á
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Feb; 183():108-115. PubMed ID: 29275949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Working memory and executive function: the influence of content and load on the control of attention.
    Hester R; Garavan H
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Mar; 33(2):221-33. PubMed ID: 16028577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Low cognitive load strengthens distractor interference while high load attenuates when cognitive load and distractor possess similar visual characteristics.
    Minamoto T; Shipstead Z; Osaka N; Engle RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1659-73. PubMed ID: 25813738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Learning in repeated visual search.
    Hout MC; Goldinger SD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jul; 72(5):1267-82. PubMed ID: 20601709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. What's on your mind: the influence of the contents of working memory on choice.
    Weaver SM; Arrington CM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Apr; 63(4):726-37. PubMed ID: 19760536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Common neural substrates for visual working memory and attention.
    Mayer JS; Bittner RA; Nikolić D; Bledowski C; Goebel R; Linden DE
    Neuroimage; 2007 Jun; 36(2):441-53. PubMed ID: 17462914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Electrophysiological evidence for different effects of working memory load on interference control in adolescents than adults.
    Spronk M; Jonkman LM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 21993351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Visual working memory simultaneously guides facilitation and inhibition during visual search.
    Dube B; Basciano A; Emrich SM; Al-Aidroos N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1232-44. PubMed ID: 27055458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Auditory working memory load impairs visual ventral stream processing: toward a unified model of attentional load.
    Klemen J; Büchel C; Bühler M; Menz MM; Rose M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Mar; 22(3):437-46. PubMed ID: 19302005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.