These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

409 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18613966)

  • 1. A unified approach to false discovery rate estimation.
    Strimmer K
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Jul; 9():303. PubMed ID: 18613966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. fdrtool: a versatile R package for estimating local and tail area-based false discovery rates.
    Strimmer K
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Jun; 24(12):1461-2. PubMed ID: 18441000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sources of variation in false discovery rate estimation include sample size, correlation, and inherent differences between groups.
    Zhang J; Coombes KR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012; 13 Suppl 13(Suppl 13):S1. PubMed ID: 23320794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Re-sampling strategy to improve the estimation of number of null hypotheses in FDR control under strong correlation structures.
    Lu X; Perkins DL
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 May; 8():157. PubMed ID: 17509157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High throughput screening of co-expressed gene pairs with controlled false discovery rate (FDR) and minimum acceptable strength (MAS).
    Zhu D; Hero AO; Qin ZS; Swaroop A
    J Comput Biol; 2005 Sep; 12(7):1029-45. PubMed ID: 16201920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multidimensional local false discovery rate for microarray studies.
    Ploner A; Calza S; Gusnanto A; Pawitan Y
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 22(5):556-65. PubMed ID: 16368770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A classification approach for DNA methylation profiling with bisulfite next-generation sequencing data.
    Cheng L; Zhu Y
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Jan; 30(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 24273245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. FDR control with pseudo-gatekeeping based on a possibly data driven order of the hypotheses.
    Farcomeni A; Finos L
    Biometrics; 2013 Sep; 69(3):606-13. PubMed ID: 23844579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A mixture model for estimating the local false discovery rate in DNA microarray analysis.
    Liao JG; Lin Y; Selvanayagam ZE; Shih WJ
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Nov; 20(16):2694-701. PubMed ID: 15145810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Empirical Bayes estimation of posterior probabilities of enrichment: a comparative study of five estimators of the local false discovery rate.
    Yang Z; Li Z; Bickel DR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Mar; 14():87. PubMed ID: 23497228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identifying differentially expressed genes using false discovery rate controlling procedures.
    Reiner A; Yekutieli D; Benjamini Y
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Feb; 19(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 12584122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. FDRestimation: Flexible False Discovery Rate Computation in R.
    Murray MH; Blume JD
    F1000Res; 2021; 10():441. PubMed ID: 34956625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. False discovery rate, sensitivity and sample size for microarray studies.
    Pawitan Y; Michiels S; Koscielny S; Gusnanto A; Ploner A
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(13):3017-24. PubMed ID: 15840707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. twilight; a Bioconductor package for estimating the local false discovery rate.
    Scheid S; Spang R
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21(12):2921-2. PubMed ID: 15817688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A note on using permutation-based false discovery rate estimates to compare different analysis methods for microarray data.
    Xie Y; Pan W; Khodursky AB
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4280-8. PubMed ID: 16188930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies.
    Datta S; Datta S
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1987-94. PubMed ID: 15691856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A simple procedure for estimating the false discovery rate.
    Dalmasso C; Broët P; Moreau T
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Mar; 21(5):660-8. PubMed ID: 15479710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving false discovery rate estimation.
    Pounds S; Cheng C
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Jul; 20(11):1737-45. PubMed ID: 14988112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On correcting the overestimation of the permutation-based false discovery rate estimator.
    Jiao S; Zhang S
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(15):1655-61. PubMed ID: 18573796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rank-invariant resampling based estimation of false discovery rate for analysis of small sample microarray data.
    Jain N; Cho H; O'Connell M; Lee JK
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 6():187. PubMed ID: 16042779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.