354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18614130)
1. On the generality of the contingent orienting hypothesis.
Yeh SL; Liao HI
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):157-65. PubMed ID: 18614130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the generality of the displaywide contingent orienting hypothesis: can a visual onset capture attention without top-down control settings for displaywide onset?
Yeh SL; Liao HI
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Oct; 135(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 20638648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A static color discontinuity can capture spatial attention when the target is an abrupt-onset singleton.
Burnham BR; Neely JH
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):831-41. PubMed ID: 18665729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.
Folk CL; Remington RW; Johnston JC
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Nov; 18(4):1030-44. PubMed ID: 1431742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is location cueing inherently superior to color cueing? Not if color is presented early enough.
Kasten R; Navon D
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):89-102. PubMed ID: 17420002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stimulus-driven attentional capture by a static discontinuity between perceptual groups.
Burnham BR; Neely JH; Naginsky Y; Thomas M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):317-29. PubMed ID: 20364921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of relational information in contingent capture.
Becker SI; Folk CL; Remington RW
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1460-76. PubMed ID: 20919781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What is top-down about contingent capture?
Belopolsky AV; Schreij D; Theeuwes J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):326-41. PubMed ID: 20139449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Additivity of abrupt onset effects supports nonspatial distraction, not the capture of spatial attention.
Folk CL; Remington RW; Wu SC
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):308-13. PubMed ID: 19304620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interaction between stimulus-driven orienting and top-down modulation in attentional capture.
Liao HI; Yeh SL
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 21645875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Top-down contingencies in peripheral cuing: The roles of color and location.
Ansorge U; Heumann M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):937-48. PubMed ID: 14585015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dissociating location-specific inhibition and attention shifts: evidence against the disengagement account of contingent capture.
Anderson BA; Folk CL
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1183-98. PubMed ID: 22673857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endogenous attention and illusory line motion depend on task set.
Chica AB; Charras P; Lupiáñez J
Vision Res; 2008 Sep; 48(21):2251-9. PubMed ID: 18639573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How do selected arrows guide visuospatial attention? Dissociating symbolic value and spatial proximity.
Leblanc E; Jolicoeur P
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1314-20. PubMed ID: 20873940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sources of top-down control in visual search.
Weidner R; Krummenacher J; Reimann B; Müller HJ; Fink GR
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Nov; 21(11):2100-13. PubMed ID: 19199412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inhibition of return and attentional control settings.
Gibson BS; Amelio J
Percept Psychophys; 2000 Apr; 62(3):496-504. PubMed ID: 10909240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Attentional capture by an unannounced color singleton depends on expectation discrepancy.
Horstmann G
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):1039-60. PubMed ID: 16262497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Irrelevant onsets cause inhibition of return regardless of attentional set.
Schreij D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1725-9. PubMed ID: 20952771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contingent attentional capture by top-down control settings: converging evidence from event-related potentials.
Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Goodin Z; Remington RW
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Jun; 34(3):509-30. PubMed ID: 18505320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Attentional capture with rapidly changing attentional control settings.
Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Johnston JC
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Feb; 36(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 20121291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
