These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18614226)
1. Polymerization shrinkage strain of interocclusal recording materials. Chun JH; Pae A; Kim SH Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 18614226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Setting characteristics of vinyl-polysiloxane interocclusal recording materials. Hatzi P; Tzakis M; Eliades G Dent Mater; 2012 Jul; 28(7):783-91. PubMed ID: 22572539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of mixing technique on shrinkage rate of one polyether and two polyvinyl siloxane impression materials. Lampé I; Marton S; Hegedüs C Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):590. PubMed ID: 15543917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials. Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The dynamic interaction of water with four dental impression materials during cure. Hosseinpour D; Berg JC J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):292-300. PubMed ID: 19210607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An experimental study on particular physical properties of several interocclusal recording media. Part III: resistance to compression after setting. Michalakis KX; Pissiotis A; Anastasiadou V; Kapari D J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 15610544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A study of the surface hardness and dimensional stability of several intermaxillary registration materials. Chai J; Tan E; Pang IC Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(6):538-42. PubMed ID: 7748448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative evaluation of dimensional stability of three types of interocclusal recording materials-an in-vitro multi-centre study. Tejo SK; Kumar AG; Kattimani VS; Desai PD; Nalla S; Chaitanya K K Head Face Med; 2012 Oct; 8():27. PubMed ID: 23039395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of vertical accuracy of interocclusal records. Vergos VK; Tripodakis AP Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 12956489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An experimental study on particular physical properties of several interocclusal recording media. Part II: Linear dimensional change and accompanying weight change. Michalakis KX; Pissiotis A; Anastasiadou V; Kapari D J Prosthodont; 2004 Sep; 13(3):150-9. PubMed ID: 15345014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vertical dimensional stability and rigidity of occlusal registration materials. Walker MP; Wu E; Heckman ME; Alderman N Gen Dent; 2009; 57(5):514-8. PubMed ID: 19903644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes in water contact angles during the first phase of setting of dental impression materials. Mondon M; Ziegler C Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 12675455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of glow-discharge and surfactant treatments on the wettability of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials. Erkut S; Can G J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):356-63. PubMed ID: 15798686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of 5 types of interocclusal recording materials on the accuracy of articulation of digital models. Sweeney S; Smith DK; Messersmith M Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Aug; 148(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 26232833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]