121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18614648)
21. Comparison of four methods to detect Trichomonas vaginalis.
Thomason JL; Gelbart SM; Sobun JF; Schulien MB; Hamilton PR
J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Sep; 26(9):1869-70. PubMed ID: 3141470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Detection of Trichomonas vaginalis in pregnant women with the InPouch TV culture system.
Draper D; Parker R; Patterson E; Jones W; Beutz M; French J; Borchardt K; McGregor J
J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Apr; 31(4):1016-8. PubMed ID: 8463382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Recovery of aerobic gram-negative bacteria from the Copan Eswab transport system after long-term storage.
Tops SCM; Kolmus M; Wulms D; van Ingen J; Wertheim HFL; Kolwijck E
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2020 Sep; 98(1):115100. PubMed ID: 32622288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Value of the modified Roiron medium for the simultaneous detection of urogenital tract infection by Trichomonas vaginalis and yeast-like fungi in humans].
Małyszko E; Zajac W; Szarmach H
Przegl Dermatol; 1976; (6 Suppl):404-10. PubMed ID: 1088589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Trichomonas vaginalis transcription-mediated amplification-based analyte-specific reagent and alternative target testing of primary clinical vaginal saline suspensions.
Munson E; Napierala M; Basile J; Miller C; Burtch J; Hryciuk JE; Schell RF
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2010 Sep; 68(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 20727473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis in adolescent females: InPouch TV culture versus wet-mount microscopy.
Ohlemeyer CL; Hornberger LL; Lynch DA; Swierkosz EM
J Adolesc Health; 1998 Mar; 22(3):205-8. PubMed ID: 9502007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Quantitative survival of aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms in Port-A-Cul and Copan transport systems.
Stoner KA; Rabe LK; Austin MN; Meyn LA; Hillier SL
J Clin Microbiol; 2008 Aug; 46(8):2739-44. PubMed ID: 18579722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cell culture compared with broth for detection of Trichomonas vaginalis.
Garber GE; Sibau L; Ma R; Proctor EM; Shaw CE; Bowie WR
J Clin Microbiol; 1987 Jul; 25(7):1275-9. PubMed ID: 3497171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Prevalence of Trichomonas vaginalis infection in women attending a major gynaecological hospital in Greece: a cross-sectional study.
Piperaki ET; Theodora M; Mendris M; Barbitsa L; Pitiriga V; Antsaklis A; Tsakris A
J Clin Pathol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):249-53. PubMed ID: 20203225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Viability of Trichomonas vaginalis in urine: epidemiologic and clinical implications.
Shafir SC; Sorvillo FJ
J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Oct; 44(10):3787-9. PubMed ID: 16928970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Viability of Trichomonas vaginalis in vitro at four temperatures.
Smith RF
J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Oct; 18(4):834-6. PubMed ID: 6605364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis vaginitis.
BURCH TA; REES CW; REARDON L
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1959 Feb; 77(2):309-13. PubMed ID: 13617324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. A comparison of yield from cervix versus vagina for culturing Candida albicans and Trichomonas vaginalis.
Boeke AJ; Dekker JH; Peerbooms PG
Genitourin Med; 1993 Feb; 69(1):41-3. PubMed ID: 8444481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A comparison of four media for the cultivation of Trichomonas vaginalis.
Mason PR; Forman L
Cent Afr J Med; 1981 Jan; 27(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 6971152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Molecular sensitivity threshold of wet mount and an immunochromatographic assay evaluated by quantitative real-time PCR for diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis infection in a low-risk population of childbearing women.
Leli C; Castronari R; Levorato L; Luciano E; Pistoni E; Perito S; Bozza S; Mencacci A
Infez Med; 2016 Jun; 24(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 27367320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [The diagnostic value of a culture study in detecting patients with trichomoniasis].
Iatsukha MV
Vestn Dermatol Venerol; 1989; (10):63-7. PubMed ID: 2609750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A COMPARISON OF CURRENT LABORATORY METHODS AND A NEW SEMI-SOLID CULTURE MEDIUM FOR THE DETECTION OF TRICHOMONAS VAGINALIS.
LOWE GH
J Clin Pathol; 1965 Jul; 18(4):432-4. PubMed ID: 14318693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Identifying a consensus sample type to test for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Mycoplasma genitalium, Trichomonas vaginalis and human papillomavirus.
Coorevits L; Traen A; Bingé L; Van Dorpe J; Praet M; Boelens J; Padalko E
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2018 Dec; 24(12):1328-1332. PubMed ID: 29559392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of affirm VP Microbial Identification Test for Gardnerella vaginalis and Trichomonas vaginalis.
Briselden AM; Hillier SL
J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Jan; 32(1):148-52. PubMed ID: 8126171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prevalence and correlates of Trichomonas vaginalis among incarcerated persons assessed using a highly sensitive molecular assay.
Freeman AH; Katz KA; Pandori MW; Rauch LM; Kohn RP; Liska S; Bernstein KT; Klausner JD
Sex Transm Dis; 2010 Mar; 37(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 20023598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
