These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18615274)

  • 1. Mentoring and research misconduct: an analysis of research mentoring in closed ORI cases.
    Wright DE; Titus SL; Cornelison JB
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2008 Sep; 14(3):323-36. PubMed ID: 18615274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perspective: research misconduct: the search for a remedy.
    Kornfeld DS
    Acad Med; 2012 Jul; 87(7):877-82. PubMed ID: 22622208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications.
    Stern AM; Casadevall A; Steen RG; Fang FC
    Elife; 2014 Aug; 3():e02956. PubMed ID: 25124673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ORI findings of scientific misconduct in clinical trials and publicly funded research, 1992-2002.
    Reynolds SM
    Clin Trials; 2004; 1(6):509-16. PubMed ID: 16279291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Office of Research Integrity: a reflection of disputes and misunderstandings.
    Scheetz MD
    Croat Med J; 1999 Sep; 40(3):321-5. PubMed ID: 10523125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scientific misconduct and accountability in teams.
    Hussinger K; Pellens M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0215962. PubMed ID: 31048907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anonymity and pseudonymity in whistleblowing to the U.S. Office of Research Integrity.
    Price AR
    Acad Med; 1998 May; 73(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 9609854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scientific forensics: how the Office of Research Integrity can assist institutional investigations of research misconduct during oversight review.
    Dahlberg JE; Davidian NM
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2010 Dec; 16(4):713-35. PubMed ID: 20526693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving the scientific misconduct hearing process.
    Parrish DM
    JAMA; 1997 Apr 23-30; 277(16):1315-9. PubMed ID: 9109472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scientific misconduct and research integrity for the bench scientist.
    Pascal CB
    Proc Soc Exp Biol Med; 2000 Sep; 224(4):220-30. PubMed ID: 10964256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Essential Need for Research Misconduct Allegation Audits.
    Loikith L; Bauchwitz R
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2016 Aug; 22(4):1027-1049. PubMed ID: 27349911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What do mentoring and training in the responsible conduct of research have to do with scientists' misbehavior? Findings from a National Survey of NIH-funded scientists.
    Anderson MS; Horn AS; Risbey KR; Ronning EA; De Vries R; Martinson BC
    Acad Med; 2007 Sep; 82(9):853-60. PubMed ID: 17726390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Malaysian researchers talk about the influence of culture on research misconduct in higher learning institutions.
    Olesen AP; Amin L; Mahadi Z
    Account Res; 2017; 24(8):469-482. PubMed ID: 29087734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Life After Research Misconduct.
    Galbraith KL
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Feb; 12(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 28220722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Research misconduct, NSF v NIH: Its nature and prevalence and the impact of their respective methods of investigation and adjudication.
    Kornfeld DS
    Account Res; 2019 Aug; 26(6):369-378. PubMed ID: 31324124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Walters and Richards comment on the examination of terminal digits of questioned data as used by the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) of the Public Health Service in misconduct cases.
    Mosimann JE
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2002; 21(6):8-9; author reply 9-11. PubMed ID: 12613205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Complainant issues in research misconduct: the office of research integrity experience.
    Pascal CB
    Exp Biol Med (Maywood); 2006 Jul; 231(7):1264-70. PubMed ID: 16816133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Research misconduct: Can Australia learn from the UK's stuttering system?
    Marcovitch H
    Med J Aust; 2006 Dec 4-18; 185(11-12):616-8. PubMed ID: 17181505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The United States Government scientific misconduct regulations and the handling of issues related to research integrity.
    Price AR
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1993; 3 Suppl 1():253-64. PubMed ID: 9857309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Research integrity and misconduct: a clarification of the concepts.
    Khanyile TD; Duma S; Fakude LP; Mbombo N; Daniels F; Sabone MS
    Curationis; 2006 Mar; 29(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 16817491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.