These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18615521)

  • 1. Crossflow filtration of yeast broth cultivated in molasses.
    Tanaka T; Kamimura R; Fujiwara R; Nakanishi K
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1994 May; 43(11):1094-101. PubMed ID: 18615521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors affecting the performance of crossflow filtration of yeast cell suspension.
    Tanaka T; Kamimura R; Itoh K; Nakanishi K; Matsuno R
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1993 Mar; 41(6):617-24. PubMed ID: 18609597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Kinetics of Permeate Flux Decline in Crossflow Membrane Filtration of Colloidal Suspensions.
    Hong S; Faibish RS; Elimelech M
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 1997 Dec; 196(2):267-277. PubMed ID: 9792752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Crossflow microfiltration of yeast suspensions in tubular filters.
    Redkar SG; Davis RH
    Biotechnol Prog; 1993; 9(6):625-34. PubMed ID: 7764351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Crossflow filtration of baker's yeast with periodical stopping of permeation flow and bubbling.
    Tanaka T; Itoh H; Itoh K; Nakanishi K; Kume T; Matsuno R
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1995 Aug; 47(3):401-4. PubMed ID: 18623414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting membrane flux decline from complex mixtures using flow-field flow fractionation measurements and semi-empirical theory.
    Pellegrino J; Wright S; Ranvill J; Amy G
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):85-92. PubMed ID: 16003965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of Interparticle Electrostatic Double Layer Interactions on Permeate Flux Decline in Crossflow Membrane Filtration of Colloidal Suspensions: An Experimental Investigation.
    Faibish RS; Elimelech M; Cohen Y
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 1998 Aug; 204(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 9665769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hydraulic resistance and fouling of microfilters by Candida utilis in fermentation broth.
    Liew MK; Fane AG; Rogers PL
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1995 Oct; 48(2):108-17. PubMed ID: 18623466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of MFI-UF constant pressure, MFI-UF constant flux and Crossflow Sampler-Modified Fouling Index Ultrafiltration (CFS-MFI UF).
    Sim LN; Ye Y; Chen V; Fane AG
    Water Res; 2011 Feb; 45(4):1639-50. PubMed ID: 21194721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microfiltration of yeast suspensions with self-cleaning spiral vortices: possibilities for a new membrane module design.
    Mallubhotla H; Nunes E; Belfort G
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1995 Nov; 48(4):375-85. PubMed ID: 18623498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modeling the influence of slurry concentration on Saccharomyces cerevisiae cake porosity and resistance during microfiltration.
    Mota M; Flickinger MC
    Biotechnol Prog; 2012; 28(6):1534-41. PubMed ID: 23011664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Yeast Cell Cake Characterization in Alcohol Solution for Efficient Microfiltration.
    Katagiri N; Tomimatsu K; Date K; Iritani E
    Membranes (Basel); 2021 Jan; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 33513956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A preliminary study on electrically enhanced crossflow microfiltration of CMP (chemical-mechanical polishing) wastewater.
    Yang GC; Yang TY; Tsai SH
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(11-12):171-6. PubMed ID: 12523750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microfiltration of recombinant yeast cells using a rotating disk dynamic filtration system.
    Lee SS; Burt A; Russotti G; Buckland B
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1995 Nov; 48(4):386-400. PubMed ID: 18623499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of membrane type and material on performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor.
    Choi JH; Ng HY
    Chemosphere; 2008 Mar; 71(5):853-9. PubMed ID: 18164743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The fouling characterization and control in the high concentration PAC membrane bioreactor HCPAC-MBR.
    Seo GT; Jang SW; Lee SH; Yoon CH
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):77-84. PubMed ID: 16003964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Properties of microfiltration membranes: Mechanisms of flux loss in the recovery of an enzyme.
    Bowen WR; Hall NJ
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1995 Apr; 46(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 18623259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Organic colloids and their influence on low-pressure membrane filtration.
    Laabs C; Amy G; Jekel M
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(12):311-6. PubMed ID: 15686036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimising the operation of a MBR pilot plant by quantitative analysis of the membrane fouling mechanism.
    Jiang T; Kennedy MD; Guinzbourg BF; Vanrolleghem PA; Schippers JC
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):19-25. PubMed ID: 16003957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characteristics of cross-flow filtration of pullulan broth.
    Yamasaki H; Lee MS; Tanaka T; Nakanishi K
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 1993 Apr; 39(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 7763548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.