144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18615683)
1. Comparison of new bone formation, implant integration, and biocompatibility between RGD-hydroxyapatite and pure hydroxyapatite coating for cementless joint prostheses--an experimental study in rabbits.
Bitschnau A; Alt V; Böhner F; Heerich KE; Margesin E; Hartmann S; Sewing A; Meyer C; Wenisch S; Schnettler R
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2009 Jan; 88(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 18615683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of gentamicin and gentamicin-RGD coatings on bone ingrowth and biocompatibility of cementless joint prostheses: an experimental study in rabbits.
Alt V; Bitschnau A; Böhner F; Heerich KE; Magesin E; Sewing A; Pavlidis T; Szalay G; Heiss C; Thormann U; Hartmann S; Pabst W; Wenisch S; Schnettler R
Acta Biomater; 2011 Mar; 7(3):1274-80. PubMed ID: 21081183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of combined gentamicin-hydroxyapatite coating for cementless joint prostheses on the reduction of infection rates in a rabbit infection prophylaxis model.
Alt V; Bitschnau A; Osterling J; Sewing A; Meyer C; Kraus R; Meissner SA; Wenisch S; Domann E; Schnettler R
Biomaterials; 2006 Sep; 27(26):4627-34. PubMed ID: 16712926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hydroxyapatite and collagen combination-coated dental implants display better bone formation in the peri-implant area than the same combination plus bone morphogenetic protein-2-coated implants, hydroxyapatite only coated implants, and uncoated implants.
Lee SW; Hahn BD; Kang TY; Lee MJ; Choi JY; Kim MK; Kim SG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 72(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 24331565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vivo biocompatibility and mechanical study of novel bone-bioactive materials for prosthetic implantation.
Zhang XS; Revell PA; Evans SL; Tuke MA; Gregson PJ
J Biomed Mater Res; 1999 Aug; 46(2):279-86. PubMed ID: 10380007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vivo comparison of bone formation on titanium implant surfaces coated with biomimetically deposited calcium phosphate or electrochemically deposited hydroxyapatite.
Yang GL; He FM; Song E; Hu JA; Wang XX; Zhao SF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):669-80. PubMed ID: 20657861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional bone response to commercially pure titanium, hydroxyapatite, and calcium-ion-mixing titanium in rabbits.
Ichikawa T; Hanawa T; Ukai H; Murakami K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 10795455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative study of the bone contact to zirconium and titanium implants after 8 weeks of implantation in rabbit femoral condyles.
AlFarraj AA; Sukumaran A; Al Amri MD; Van Oirschot AB; Jansen JA
Odontology; 2018 Jan; 106(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 28194543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surface modification of implants in long bone.
Förster Y; Rentsch C; Schneiders W; Bernhardt R; Simon JC; Worch H; Rammelt S
Biomatter; 2012; 2(3):149-57. PubMed ID: 23507866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Functionalization of dental implant surfaces using adhesion molecules.
Schliephake H; Scharnweber D; Dard M; Sewing A; Aref A; Roessler S
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2005 Apr; 73(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 15786448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Vertical bone augmentation induced by ultrathin hydroxyapatite sputtered coated mini titanium implants in a rabbit calvaria model.
Wang X; Zakaria O; Madi M; Hao J; Chou J; Kasugai S
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2015 Nov; 103(8):1700-8. PubMed ID: 25533173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hydroxyapatite-coating on titanium arc sprayed titanium implants.
Nakashima Y; Hayashi K; Inadome T; Uenoyama K; Hara T; Kanemaru T; Sugioka Y; Noda I
J Biomed Mater Res; 1997 Jun; 35(3):287-98. PubMed ID: 9138063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Histologic comparison of a thermal dual-etched implant surface to machined, TPS, and HA surfaces: bone contact in vivo in rabbits.
London RM; Roberts FA; Baker DA; Rohrer MD; O'Neal RB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 12074452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vivo evaluation of cp Ti implants with modified surfaces by laser beam with and without hydroxyapatite chemical deposition and without and with thermal treatment: topographic characterization and histomorphometric analysis in rabbits.
Queiroz TP; de Molon RS; Souza FÁ; Margonar R; Thomazini AH; Guastaldi AC; Hochuli-Vieira E
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):685-699. PubMed ID: 27530186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of hydroxyapatite and hydroxyapatite tricalcium-phosphate coatings.
Jinno T; Davy DT; Goldberg VM
J Arthroplasty; 2002 Oct; 17(7):902-9. PubMed ID: 12375251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vivo behaviour of hydroxyapatite coatings on titanium implants: a quantitative study in the rabbit.
Darimont GL; Cloots R; Heinen E; Seidel L; Legrand R
Biomaterials; 2002 Jun; 23(12):2569-75. PubMed ID: 12033605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hydroxyapatite and silk combination-coated dental implants result in superior bone formation in the peri-implant area compared with hydroxyapatite and collagen combination-coated implants.
Kweon H; Lee SW; Hahn BD; Lee YC; Kim SG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 72(10):1928-36. PubMed ID: 25234528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combined Treatment Effects Using Bioactive-Coated Implants and Ceramic Granulate in a Rabbit Femoral Condyle Model.
Preethanath RS; Rajesh P; Varma H; Anil S; Jansen JA; van den Beucken JJ
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2016 Aug; 18(4):666-77. PubMed ID: 26115085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bone response to machined and resorbable blast material titanium implants: an experimental study in rabbits.
Piattelli M; Scarano A; Paolantonio M; Iezzi G; Petrone G; Piattelli A
J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 12498456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bone responses to rough titanium implants coated with biomimetic Ca-P in rabbit tibia.
He F; Yang G; Wang X; Zhao S
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2009 Aug; 90(2):857-63. PubMed ID: 19280633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
