These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18616391)

  • 1. The renaissance of field experimentation in evaluating interventions.
    Shadish WR; Cook TD
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2009; 60():607-29. PubMed ID: 18616391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical trials methodology: randomization, intent-to-treat, and random-effects regression.
    Atkins DC
    Depress Anxiety; 2009; 26(8):697-700. PubMed ID: 19658122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The clinician as investigator: participating in clinical trials in the practice setting: Appendix 2: statistical concepts in study design and analysis.
    Lader EW; Cannon CP; Ohman EM; Newby LK; Sulmasy DP; Barst RJ; Fair JM; Flather M; Freedman JE; Frye RL; Hand MM; Jesse RL; Van de Werf F; Costa F;
    Circulation; 2004 Jun; 109(21):e305-7. PubMed ID: 15173053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methodological idiosyncracies, frameworks and challenges of non-pharmaceutical and non-technical treatment interventions.
    Schünemann HJ
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2013; 107(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 23790697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detecting and adjusting for small-study effects in meta-analysis.
    Rücker G; Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G
    Biom J; 2011 Mar; 53(2):351-68. PubMed ID: 21374698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistical trial designs and clinical practice: are they compatible?
    Punt CJ
    Onkologie; 2003 Dec; 26(6):518-9. PubMed ID: 14709922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A practical limit to trials needed in one-person randomized controlled experiments.
    Alemi R; Alemi F
    Qual Manag Health Care; 2007; 16(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 17426611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Having one's cake and eating it, too: combining true experiments with regression discontinuity designs.
    Mandell MB
    Eval Rev; 2008 Oct; 32(5):415-34. PubMed ID: 18458099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Propensity scores: an introduction and experimental test.
    Luellen JK; Shadish WR; Clark MH
    Eval Rev; 2005 Dec; 29(6):530-58. PubMed ID: 16244051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inclusion of quasi-experimental studies in systematic reviews of health systems research.
    Rockers PC; Røttingen JA; Shemilt I; Tugwell P; Bärnighausen T
    Health Policy; 2015 Apr; 119(4):511-21. PubMed ID: 25776033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Regression discontinuity designs are underutilized in medicine, epidemiology, and public health: a review of current and best practice.
    Moscoe E; Bor J; Bärnighausen T
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 68(2):122-33. PubMed ID: 25579639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Designs of Empirical Evaluations of Nonexperimental Methods in Field Settings.
    Wong VC; Steiner PM
    Eval Rev; 2018 Apr; 42(2):176-213. PubMed ID: 29954223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomized experiment comparing random and cutoff-based assignment.
    Shadish WR; Galindo R; Wong VC; Steiner PM; Cook TD
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Jun; 16(2):179-91. PubMed ID: 21534684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sample size estimation: an overview with applications to orthodontic clinical trial designs.
    Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):e141-6. PubMed ID: 21967951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Average causal effects from nonrandomized studies: a practical guide and simulated example.
    Schafer JL; Kang J
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Dec; 13(4):279-313. PubMed ID: 19071996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quasi-experimental study designs series-paper 6: risk of bias assessment.
    Waddington H; Aloe AM; Becker BJ; Djimeu EW; Hombrados JG; Tugwell P; Wells G; Reeves B
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Sep; 89():43-52. PubMed ID: 28351693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Randomized and nonrandomized studies: complementary or competing?
    Pandis N; Tu YK; Fleming PS; Polychronopoulou A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):633-40. PubMed ID: 25439214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of factorial survival experiments.
    Slud EV
    Biometrics; 1994 Mar; 50(1):25-38. PubMed ID: 8086609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Clinical trials: methodological requirements and interpretation].
    Windeler J; Lange S
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2009 Apr; 52(4):394-401. PubMed ID: 19322527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Regulatory perspectives on multiplicity in adaptive design clinical trials throughout a drug development program.
    Wang SJ; Hung HM; O'Neill R
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jul; 21(4):846-59. PubMed ID: 21516573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.