BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18616521)

  • 1. Evaluation of the size 4 i-gel airway in one hundred non-paralysed patients.
    Gatward JJ; Cook TM; Seller C; Handel J; Simpson T; Vanek V; Kelly F
    Anaesthesia; 2008 Oct; 63(10):1124-30. PubMed ID: 18616521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the LMA Supreme in 100 non-paralysed patients.
    Cook TM; Gatward JJ; Handel J; Hardy R; Thompson C; Srivastava R; Clarke PA
    Anaesthesia; 2009 May; 64(5):555-62. PubMed ID: 19413827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A cohort evaluation of the paediatric i-gel(™) airway during anaesthesia in 120 children.
    Beringer RM; Kelly F; Cook TM; Nolan J; Hardy R; Simpson T; White MC
    Anaesthesia; 2011 Dec; 66(12):1121-6. PubMed ID: 21883132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.
    Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Hohlrieder M; Keller C
    Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the Intersurgical Solus laryngeal mask airway and the i-gel supralaryngeal device.
    Amini S; Khoshfetrat M
    Anaesthesia; 2010 Aug; 65(8):805-9. PubMed ID: 20560920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomised crossover trial comparing the i-gel supraglottic airway and classic laryngeal mask airway.
    Janakiraman C; Chethan DB; Wilkes AR; Stacey MR; Goodwin N
    Anaesthesia; 2009 Jun; 64(6):674-8. PubMed ID: 19453322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of the disposable vs the reusable laryngeal tube in paralysed adult patients.
    Amini A; Zand F; Sadeghi SE
    Anaesthesia; 2007 Nov; 62(11):1167-70. PubMed ID: 17924899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of the i-gel with the LMA-Unique in non-paralysed anaesthetised adult patients.
    Francksen H; Renner J; Hanss R; Scholz J; Doerges V; Bein B
    Anaesthesia; 2009 Oct; 64(10):1118-24. PubMed ID: 19735404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A clinical evaluation of the I-gel ™ supraglottic airway device in children.
    Hughes C; Place K; Berg S; Mason D
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Aug; 22(8):765-71. PubMed ID: 22672411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomised comparison of the Portex Softseal laryngeal mask airway with the LMA-Unique during anaesthesia.
    Cook TM; Trümpelmann P; Beringer R; Stedeford J
    Anaesthesia; 2005 Dec; 60(12):1218-25. PubMed ID: 16288620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A clinical evaluation of four disposable laryngeal masks in adult patients.
    López AM; Valero R; Bovaira P; Pons M; Sala-Blanch X; Anglada T
    J Clin Anesth; 2008 Nov; 20(7):514-20. PubMed ID: 19019649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective, randomized comparison of laryngeal tube and laryngeal mask airway in pediatric patients.
    Genzwuerker HV; Fritz A; Hinkelbein J; Finteis T; Schlaefer A; Schaeffer M; Thil E; Rapp HJ
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2006 Dec; 16(12):1251-6. PubMed ID: 17121555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. I-gel insertion by novices in manikins and patients.
    Wharton NM; Gibbison B; Gabbott DA; Haslam GM; Muchatuta N; Cook TM
    Anaesthesia; 2008 Sep; 63(9):991-5. PubMed ID: 18557971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Soft Seal disposable laryngeal mask airway in adults: comparison of two insertion techniques without intra-oral manipulation.
    Kuvaki B; Küçükgüçlü S; Iyilikçi L; Tuncali BE; Cinar O
    Anaesthesia; 2008 Oct; 63(10):1131-4. PubMed ID: 18647291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective clinical and fiberoptic evaluation of the Supreme laryngeal mask airway.
    Timmermann A; Cremer S; Eich C; Kazmaier S; Bräuer A; Graf BM; Russo SG
    Anesthesiology; 2009 Feb; 110(2):262-5. PubMed ID: 19194153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of the disposable Ambu AuraOnce Laryngeal Mask with the reusable LMA Classic laryngeal mask airway.
    Sudhir G; Redfern D; Hall JE; Wilkes AR; Cann C
    Anaesthesia; 2007 Jul; 62(7):719-22. PubMed ID: 17567349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A cohort evaluation of the pediatric ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in 100 children.
    Kelly F; Sale S; Bayley G; Cook T; Stoddart P; White M
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2008 Oct; 18(10):947-51. PubMed ID: 18647270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomised crossover comparison of the Ambu AuraOnce Laryngeal Mask with the LMA Classic laryngeal mask airway in paralysed anaesthetised patients.
    Shariffuddin II; Wang CY
    Anaesthesia; 2008 Jan; 63(1):82-5. PubMed ID: 18086075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the CobraPLA (Cobra Perilaryngeal Airway) and the Laryngeal Mask Airway Unique in children under pressure controlled ventilation.
    Gaitini L; Carmi N; Yanovski B; Tome R; Resnikov I; Gankin I; Somri M; Alfery D
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2008 Apr; 18(4):313-9. PubMed ID: 18315637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of LMA Unique, Ambu laryngeal mask and Soft Seal laryngeal mask during routine surgical procedures.
    Francksen H; Bein B; Cavus E; Renner J; Scholz J; Steinfath M; Tonner PH; Doerges V
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2007 Feb; 24(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 16895620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.